You two questions. can you do this. can one expand the court without delegitimizing the court? it is the court of it is the job of the court to get things done that can be done legislatively? i think you could add justices to the court without diligent to my zing it. i think anything we know, historically, is that the legitimacy of the court and the perceived legitimacy of the court is to feel something other than partisan. we know this in part that it is at its all-time low in terms of public approval and says pulling has started. it is connected to the perception that it is partisan. balance the court so that the decisions do not have partisan view and it is a perceived ahead of time. we know that we could add justices to the court with different people in congress. as professor murray said, it is a question of how we get that done and if it is possible. that really depends on the
This is really about delegitimizing the court and attacking justice thomas is not anything about the substance for recusal questions. when we come back democrats midterm hopes hanging in the balance. how progressives are calling on present buying two pipe asked congress enact their congress priority or risk losing their support. five stocks in the s&p 500®. you can also unlock short videos, step-by-step guides, and other easy-to-use tools designed for people just getting started. plus, investment professionals are on standby 24/7 if you ever have a question. it s investing 101, reimagined.