calling it unconstitutional. and terrifying. undeclared on twitter, we still believe in freedom from tyrants. even though a cheryl stolberg points out in the new york times, there s a deep inconsistency in that. argument mississippi as some of the strictest vaccine mandates in the nation. which is not drawn opposition for most of its officials. not only does it require children to be vaccinated against measles month and seven other diseases, your eye goes a step further than the most states by barring parents from claiming religious philosophical or conscience is exemptions. in fact every single state in our nation has some kind of legally mandated vaccine for children go to school. and yet there are nearly two dozen republican governors who have vowed to block president biden s vaccine requirements, all four of the f4 mentioned piece titled gop see this edged biden mandate, even in states requiring other vaccines. she joins me now joe. can you lay out a little bit, i thought it wa
answer, was never brought in for contempt proceedings as threatened with mr. strzok. i wanted to be sure the public saw the deep, deep inconsistency which i think illustrates this is all an effort to protect the president and nothing more than that when our ballot box and our democracy needs more protecting than ever. david? i wanted to ask you what you would say to a member of the public watching this whose conclusion was this is all politics. i don t know about peter strzok, but this is a circus. there is that feeling in the country. lot of people fear that s going to undermine mueller s investigation, or get swallowed up in this political environment. how do you think that can be prevented? it was the wrong hearing, wrong priorities. children are still separated at the border. this is the committee that has jurisdiction to do something about it, they did nothing for those children yesterday. david, i would also say for
we find a guy like this guy, simpson, is a troublemaker. he was going to go to somalia and join up. he lied and they let him walk with a lessor charge. can we take people we know having committed serious crimes and imprison them? that s what the right wing seems to be saying we can do, e.j.? i just want to underscore ryan s point. we are supposed to do absolutely everything to stop terrorism but we can never take a gun away from anybody, even if they have been convicted of a crime. there is a deep inconsistency. if you want to criticize the government, peter king was somewhat more responsible. peter king, who is a pretty hard line guy said, look, maybe with he should have more surveillance on somebody who was. let s take a look. good point. i do believe in having more surveillance of people in the muslim community, because that s
this is the big problem we have. we find a guy like this guy, simpson, is a troublemaker. he was going to go to somalia and join up. he lied and they let him walk with a lessor charge. can we take people we know having committed serious crimes and imprison them? that s what the right wing seems to be saying we can do e.j.? i just want to underscore ryan s point. we are supposed to do absolutely everything to stop terrorism but we can never take a gun away from anybody, feechb they have been convicted of a crime. there is a deep inconsistency. if you want to criticize the government peter king was somewhat more responsible. peter king who es a pretty hard line guy said, look maybe with he should have more surveillance on somebody who was. let s take a look. good point. i do believe in having more