Latest Breaking News On - Decision hold - Page 1 : comparemela.com
This decision hold, is the worst-case scenario. i know a lot of people are thinking maybe the court would uphold this mississippi law while still not explicitly rejecting roe and trying to find some middle space. we know that is not the case now. this is a full frontal attack on the due process. and i think that part also is very surprising to me. what do you think about that, tally? what does this do to other rights of privacy that we have. well, the draft opinion. protests a lot about this. protests may be too much about this, because it says right there, he asks justice alito, where does it say abortion in the constitution? how many times? and he says, zero. that s one sentence. so that begs the question, what about all the other rights that aren t written in the constitution? and he says, well, we re not going after the ones that are rooted in the history and traditions of this country. and that are essential to liberty. but, it s not entirely obvious
PeopleLotVigilante-lawRoeCaseSupreme-courtSpaceScenarioMississippiDecision-holdRightsOpinionAppears to be if it holds for the staff opinion, should not come to any surprise. the two things that surprised me is, of course, the leak. i ve been covering for most of my career. something like this has never happened. from the court before. but, also, just a full-throated evisceration from justice alito. that, and an opinion that didn t just, doesn t just report to overturn roe v. wade, but literally set it on fire. that four other votes on that court is very shocking. and what that says to me is, this is just the beginning. that any right that is based on substance of due process, the idea that there are rights that are protected even if they are not specifically enumerated in the constitution is up for grabs. i think this is probably, if this decision hold, is the worst-case scenario. i know a lot of people are thinking maybe the court would uphold this mississippi law
SomethingOpinionCourseThingsLeakCareerMostStaffSurpriseTwoCultivating-a-supreme-courtRoe-v-wade no doubt. both sides of responsible for the deterioration of any kind of consensus candidate. that doesn t exist anymore. when people are talking about it got so partisan, that has infected the process of the courts as well. if you look over history, take the nine or eight currently serving justices and look at their votes. their confirmation votes. ruth bader ginsburg had 90 something votes to confirm. you are over this last generation, you have seen the narrowing of the vote and the more partisanship fuel-injected into the process. harry reid going nuclear and mitch mcconnell said the supreme court as well. that ensured that we were in a place. if you don t need 60, you don t need to reach across the aisle if you have a majority. and the decision hold back the seat on merrick garland. you can see the results on all
PeopleDoesn-tNo-doubtSidesConsensusCandidateDeteriorationKindSomethingVotesProcessRuth-bader-ginsburg