i ask, years. we are almost at a time. can i ask. how does years. we are almost at a time. can i ask, how does your years. we are almost at a time. can i ask, how does your satire - years. we are almost at a time. can i ask, how does your satire change, | i ask, how does your satire change, if at all, if labour should win the next election? next election? how does it.? i need to see next election? how does it.? i need to see what next election? how does it.? i need to see what they re - next election? how does it.? i need to see what they re like, . need to see what they re like, first! need to see what they re like, first! ., ., i need to see what they re like, | first! i remember need to see what they re like, - first! i remember doing first! fair enough! i remember doing a weekly tepical first! fair enough! i remember doing a weekly topical show first! fair enough! i remember doing a weekly topical show during - first! fair enough! i remember doing a weekly topical
extraordinarily useful for them. now, you appear to be saying, you know what, be very careful because this is actually doing structural damage, notjust to your life but to the society and economy in which you live ? i think the answer to your question comes back to the point i made earlier. ai has great promise and potential for great damage. the generative al, or the large language models, could be a new tool for augmenting what we do in knowledge work, in white collar work, injournalism, academia. it s not currently going in that direction because actually, gpt i or chatgpt have very impressive looking results, but, deep down, they are not super useful for knowledge workers at the moment. but at the same time, many of these things are already being used for centralising information further and replacing workers that used to do simple analytical tasks such as writing tasks or summarising news and so on,
economy, and importantly, how will it impact on the rest of the global economy? let s start with a fellow at the think tank, the council on foreign relations. zoe liu, a real pleasure having you on my show. thank you for your time. let s start with this because i am wondering what do the personal changes at the top of the communist party, what do they tell us about the way decisions are likely to be made? because i m wondering all of the commentary is like centralising power and decision making around president xijinping. thank you very much, first of all, for having me on your show. it does look like xi jinping replaced a lot of those pro reform oriented minds with his loyalists. it does show that there is a major consolidation of power, especially people who are personally loyal to president xijinping, by putting himself in front of all of this decision making, he basically reviewed that he is going to personally put a stand on major policy
the company and now he s going to try to make it or remake it in a different image and it probably will be a quite different product five years from now. and by sacking the board, he s allowed himself the space, the ability to do things in the way he wants at the rate he wants. absolutely. i mean, it was clear of the past few years the boarded quite ineffective. the company has not grown. it has become, it has remained unprofitable and has not innovated. if you want to move the company quickly and change a company quickly centralising control as a normal thing to do. centralising control is a normal thing to do. and removing executives is a normal thing to do. it may appear unpleasant but you ve got to move swiftly in these situations but you ve got to move swiftly to make change happens. many uses are very invested in the profiles they have on twitter. many users are very invested in the profiles they have on twitter. do you think that elon musk
let s start with a fellow at the think tank, the council of foreign relations. zoe, a real pleasure having you on my show. thank you for your time. let s start with this because i am wondering what to the personal what do they tell us about the way decisions are likely to be made, because i m i m wondering all of the commentary is like centralising power and decision making around president xijinping. thank you very much for having me on your show. it does look like president xijinping replaced a lot of those pro reform oriented to remind with his loyalists. he did not show that there is a major consolidation of power, especially people who loyal to president xijinping,