more sense of why the committee is pushing so hard to force meadow to comply with their subpoena. if this batch indicates what we don t have, it tells us a lot about the frustration. great point. the guardian notes that there is a break, i think december 19th or 30th, of the meadows tax. we don t know it has been turned over or not. what do you think about the nature of the evidentiary record, at least as we know it up to this point, and in terms of what the committee has or has yet to obtain? i think the complete report will be fascinating. and i cannot wait for the public hearings, which i consider really important. but i think that some of what we have seen in the last few days may explain why the department of justice has not yet indicted mark meadows for contempt. and it may be because these documents show him to be an
don t have, it tells us a lot about the frustration. great point. the guardian notes that there is a break, i think december 19th or 30th, of the meadows texts. we don t know if it has been turned over or not. what do you think about the nature of the evidentiary record, at least as we know it up to this point, and in terms of what the committee has or has yet to obtain? i think the complete report will be fascinating. and i cannot wait for the public hearings, which i consider really important. but i think that some of what we have seen in the last few days may explain why the department of justice has not yet indicted mark meadows for contempt. and it may be because these documents show him to be an active participant in a coup. and maybe they are looking at him more seriously for a