the judge saw through it and smelled a rat. and she called them in and said, look, what does the deal say. can t he be prosecuted? i hope she ask another question. who is telling the truth? when there was an ability the special counsel, the u.s. attorney to investigate anywhere the district of columbia, los angeles, burisma, or was smith mama i m sorry, or was weiss right when he definitely told and denies it that he was extremely limited. we have to find out? the job of the damage is to not to defend either side but to protect the instance of justice and the rule of law and the american public. i hope she goes further. she asked the right question. now let her ask other questions that will put merrick garland under oath. let s get to the bottom of this.
i want to be very clear that the president put out his budget and it wasn t for another month after that that the that the republicans default on america bill came out. and so until we had both budgets essentially, the republican blueprint which wanted to slash veterans funding, slash funding for children and seniors versus the president s budget, once we had those two documents, we were able to move forward. but this agreement, let me tell you when i heard my colleagues who are airing their views on this deal say that there were no democratic wins, that is simply not true. there was a bill, the veterans the military construction and veterans affair bill that was supposed to be marked thup week. i m the ranking member and that markup was canceled because the republicans were about to slash
everything and ideally get them past, you have to remember that there are all kinds of ways that people can affect this process, the budget process in particular, just democrats doing that, republicans can force the senate to stay in overnight. they re working on amendments to try to derail different things. so we re long way from seeing this become law. more optimism on police reform. republicans working on a deal say they re optimistic they can announce an agreement before they leave the capital for the fourth of july recess. i do think we re making more progress in the last day or two than we have in the last week. so i think we re going to be, you know, headed towards that ted line tomorrow and hopefully that we ll get there on the right side of the issue. i don t think there s outstanding issues that need to be worked out. we need to agree on the language we re using. i think everybody wants to get to yes. there s a general framework that
congress, a different administration. i think it has some really big problems. the good part of this deal, and the critics aren t given the president credit for this. is that 95% stock while of uranium. it could be purified on make ten bombs, has to be shift out of the country. two-thirds of the centrifuges need to be moth balled. the bad part of the initial phase of this agreement is that iran will get its hands on $120 billion or so of its own money. they will use this to help their own people to some degree. they ve built expectations. let me stop you there for one seconds. the president points to this repeatedly and people who back the deal say, the money is
i think it has some really big problems. the good part of this deal, and the critics aren t given the president credit for this. is that 95% stock while of uranium. it could be purified on make ten bombs, has to be shift out of the country. two-thirds of the centrifuges need to be moth balled. the bad part of the initial phase of this agreement is that iran will get its hands on $120 billion or so of its own money. they will use this to help their own people to some degree. they ve built expectations. let me stop you there for one seconds. the president points to this repeatedly and people who back the deal say, the money is coming either way. the sanction regime that has been held together is not