so infrastructure package, this additional $3 trillion in spending with we don t even know all the taxes but a lot of them look, larry summers, the former democrat guy who was running the you know, the treasury department, has warned about inflation. we re seeing inflation tailed, which hurts everybody. but what we know is that there are many democrats who are not on the left. we have democrats who are more conservative who are worried about getting re-elected. and so david made the good case. yeah, bernie sanders, elizabeth warren, they re all happy. but that s not where the party is. and frankly, that s not the way that joe biden ran for president. he ran for president but david, with all due respect two different arguments you seem to be making two different arguments here. you are saying that he s getting pulled by the left but the party is actually more centrist. yes. i don t understand your argument there because as david
republican governor and apparently may not have been able to do that. that s where the trump linkage comes in. it s not that bevin was not an unpopular governor. he was. he was behind in this race. the other republicans on the ballot did do better. but republicans who are going to be so eager to try to delink donald trump from this, there should be some concern there in doing that too quickly because what we are seeing what john just went through, the inroads democrats have made in the suburbs, that is real. that is a real sign of what s happening in american politics in the trump era. and republicans are very aware of that. they saw, as they went from the majority to the minority in the house, based on that trump era trend, and that is still continuing tonight. so if they just sort of look past this and say, oh, it s just bevin, republicans may be missing an important lesson here tonight. i m glad you said that. go ahead, dana. i was just going to say i just want to add to that,
record, as david just said and he has substance to back it up. marco rubio is still one of those candidates, he hasn t peaked too soon, that s for sure, hasn t peak the yet and is going in that direction and i think tomorrow night is an important night for him but he s performed fine throughout so i think tomorrow he will as well. here s the problem for marco rubio. he has tried to court each of the constituencies of the republican party, social conservatives, tea party conservatives, establishment republicans and he s done very well tat so far. the question is can you ride three horses and end up as someone s first choice and i don t know, he may end up as everybody s second choice but he has to win somewhere and it s not clear to me in the first four contests where that is, maybe here in nevada and he has to emerge here as someone s first choice, and and so he may have to make some choices in this debate as to which way he orients his canned. i really quick before i let you go
going to continue, and maybe that s one of the reasons they are doing it. i understand what david is is saying, but they have a campaign that they say is red for the south, you know. cruz has been smart about campaigning in the south, but in iowa i was told yesterday that they have got 70,000 pieces of data on every single voter. yes. in iowa. that maybe more than obama had. i m sure marco rubio is thinking he s willing to let the campaign have the information but not the nsa. that s definitely going to be a topic. speak of marco rubio, how important of a night is this for him, jeff? it s an important night and marco rubio haeks seld in every debate. i can t think of one debate where he s had where he hasn t incrementally most ball along here. he eslow and stead and is approaching this position where he s fluent on every issue. he injects a bit of biography every chance he can so i think tomorrow night is important for him because he will be challenging cruz on his voti
clearly david is fought a fan of glenn beck and it is not willing to consider the opinions of or his critic whose saw the sincerity of reflection or are you willing to accept that he has been having this conversation for quite some time. this is not a new revelation for his listeners, watchers or people would read his work. i am glad he is having it with his employees like you. i don t want him having it on the mainstream media. he was bad for american television. i m sorry. that doesn t change because he is nice to you the. we will get to the broader question in a moment. talk about the conditioning conversation and he said he has not changed and the critics are shocked because they think i am an anti-gay racist nut job. that was one of the things that shocked me, that the media was accusing him of things he