that was sunday on meet the press. when fellow republicans heard that, a lot of them went ballistic. by monday, paul ryan was saying, wth can allies like that, who needs the left? by tuesday, gingrich called paul ryan to apologize. but he was blaming, of course, the media. look, i made two mistakes. first of all, if you listen to the question david gregory asked me, i should have said i m not going to answer it. it s a hypothetical baloney question that had no hope of happening. the second was some of the words i used. but i was trying to say something that s really important. we are at the beginning of a process of solving the entitlement problems in the united states. these are enormous challenges. i believe deeply that the american people have to be an integral part of it. i think what paul ryan has done is he s started that process. that was gingrich on fox where their team of political pundits has been declaring his campaign dead all day. two things to keep in mind, menti
Coming back because he ll never be able to be extradited. all they ve got to do then, and what i assume happened here, is show that it was booked, that it was booked prior to this incident, and that he was the one, as mr. taylor was saying just then, he had called twice. he was the one who alerted to where he was, he was at jfk. if this was somebody trying to flee, he s not going to call for his cell phone. he would have got on the flight and he would be gone and they never would have seen him again. i think you do have to push back when you re talking about somebody s liberty. the idea that it was no bail for a couple of days is ludicrous, because this is not a murder case, this is not a no-bail case. this is a case where he should have received bail and did receive bail today. jeff, last night on the program you predicted he would receive bail and resign from the imf, both of which have happened. you say you think he got lucky with this bail. this was a close, close question. the
i don t think right wing social engineering is any more desirable than left wing social engineering. i don t think imposing radical change from the right or left is a very good way for a free society to operate. that was sunday on meet the press. when fellow republicans heard that, they went ballistic. paul ryan was saying, with allies like that, who needs the left? by tuesday, gingrich called paul ryan to apologize. but he was blaming, of course, the media. look, i made two mistakes. first of all, if you listen to the question david gregory asked me, i should have said i m not going to answer it. the second was some of the words i used. but i was trying to say something that s really important. we are at the beginning of a process of solving the entitlement problems in the united states. these are enormous challenges. i believe deeply that the american people have to be an
Spent in randall s island. instead he s going to be with his wife, eating the food he wants, seeing the people he wants, in ran apartment in manhattan. it makes a huge difference in his life. mark, when you re representing a client like this, how time consuming does this become for the client? last night jeff was talking about he needs to dedicate a lot of time focusing on this case moving forward. is that what you found with clients? in this case, given the stakes here, there s no question. he s going to spend 24-7 on this case. there s no way that he would have been able to retain his position, even if released on bail. so this is something where he s going to have to dedicate his life to getting out of this. for all intents and purposes, he s facing a tantmount to a life sentence here. he needs to defend this case and
Ought to buck the public opposition and move forward to change medicare? turn it into a voucher program where you give seniors some premium support so they can buy private insurance? i don t think right wing social engineering is any more desirable than left wing social engineering. so is asking about one of the central issues of the campaign baloney? is it hypothetical? take a look. on this vote, the yays are 235 and the nays are 193. the concurrent resolution is agreed to. that s a real gavel, real vote in the nonhypothetical congress on the real gop budget containing the paul ryan plan to privatize medicare. gingrich said because the senate won t pass it and the president won t sign it, the question was hypothetical. and you can make up your own mind on that. but today he tried to tell rush limbaugh his answer had nothing to do with paul ryan. it was not a reference to paul ryan. there was no reference to paul