that they developed more easily to their allies but they will be able to import from russia and china the technology they need for icbm s or surface to air weapons and so forth. ambassador burns. there is no question the iranians were trying to split the p-5 in the last week of the negotiations with this proposal. point one. there is no way we could have accepted this, so i was trying to dive through the details coming over here, if we can maintain the u.n. weapons and embargoes for five to eight years, that s good for the united states. hold on, five to eight years they in ten years they are going to have the capability for undetectable breakout, ten years plus under this agreement. why would we want to agree to five years lifting and eight years for the russian transference of that capability? why would the united states sign off on such an agreement ambassador? i am not here of course to represent the administration i am just a private citizen. this is a painful tr
you can resite the litany in which they are justified that unfortunate conclusion. the one way to have confidence in the agreement is if the verification inspections provisions of it were air tight anywhere, any time but they are not. they create a whole negotiating process, as we said, 14 days, 21 days, appeal to a board. it is an invitation to the iranians to on advice kate and if they are caught with something wrong to get the time to get it out of the view of the international inspectors. in the area of in spectors whatever you are inspecting giving notice to whoever you are going to inspect always allows them to hide or fix the problem before you get there. it seems to me with 24 days, would you be able to hind the grand canyon or something. i find that as a problem. big picture is it still the policy of iran today to destroy the united states? well, until we hear otherwise, i think we have to say it is. and israel as well. and israel. and now you notice that l
the past 30 years. in the next hour you will see clips with u.s. central command adviser david crist, author of the twilight war, abraham sofer, former legal adviser to the state department, and author of taking on iran. and president of the national iranian american council and author of a single roll the dice. we start with david christian author of the twilight war, the secret history of america s 30-year conflict. he sits down with former national security council official to discuss internal debates within the american military government over relations with the wrong. how to manage the iran problem, how to act . clear signals about redlines an element, without being so confrontational that the only option is to escalate military tensions buried at the your book had some really original material on some of these debates within the military. i wonder if you could talk to us a little bit about said, is out in the arena. trying to set the course of u.s. policy. a few storie
Battleship USS New Jersey Repairs Help Preserve Option to Reactivate It! theepochtimes.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from theepochtimes.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.