Georgia, he met Misty Hampton, and somehow got her number and went back to the white house with it. And that was someone that they were on the phone with very quickly after that, obviously trying to get access to the Voting Software and Coffee County. When meadows went on to georgia, the Misty Hampton Coffee County story is interesting, just to remind folks of that story. Which cnn broke yesterday. And caitlin, you will jump in if i get any of this wrong. But it seems as though Coffee County Election Officials invited Trump Campaign officials to basically have access to their Voting Machines. Which according to prosecutors who is not illegal, is that right . Yes, it is not illegal. And she is somebody who basically had written this statement in and all of our colleagues are people who broke this fascinating story. But she had basically written the invitation to come and view the software, which they are not allowed to do. Those are messages that were then transmitted to Trump Campaign
are big ones. as many as 2500 felons with uncompleted sentence voted illegally. 66,000 people voted illegally, all of these lies on and on and on. don t trump used to saying things that are not true, and not having any consequences, but you can t do that in a sworn document to a court of law. so, two things. as i recall, this comes out because of the january 6th committee hearings, because they are trying to get hold of some eastman emails that they know are out there that he will not turn over. and they go to court, i think it was a judge david cardita carter. this was about the crime fraud exception, that is what they are going. explain what you made about the crime fraud exception. laura, explain what i mean. there s no confidentiality
how that might play out? the rico charges has time that you have to serve, so it s not a pro baited sentence. district attorney, what does the timetable for the trial? what does the timetable for the trial? as you know, in this jurisdiction, trials are set by the judges and so it will be the judge that sets the date of the trial. this office will be submitting a proposed schedule an order within this week. however, that will totally be at the destruction of the judge. you are the fourth jurisdiction now to indict donald trump. do you believe you need to be the fourth one to try him, or would you move him up? could you be the first to try him? i don t have any desire to be first or last, i want to try him and the respectable for our sovereign states. we do want to move this case along, and so we will be asking for a proposed order that occurs, a trial date within the next six months. earlier today there was a
something that was reflected of that. so we are gonna wait to see exactly what she has to say tonight about the state of the case, about the state of the investigation. and we are also gonna wait to see, frankly, what the next steps are here. this is a little bit different than what we have seen in federal court. you know, other courts where we have seen the indictment unsealed. and then donald trump immediately shows up, he surrenders. he is arraigned. that is not necessarily how that will work in a state court. we don t know when donald trump or other defendants would be expected to surrender. frankly, when they would be called to appear in court is going to be up to the judge who is assigned to this case. so we are also gonna be looking for next steps as to how this is going to proceed. anderson? they re, murphy about three minutes we expect fani willis or seven let s go up to. jake all, right anderson, we are pouring over these documents, he didn t really get a lot of time, i
she is going to be expected to try this incredibly complex rico case and she can t answer how the document got posted. people are going to have a lot of questions. i appreciate it, let s go back to jake. thank you anderson. we are going to stick with the document that was released this evening and let us talk, because earlier this evening you reminded us all that there had been reporting suggesting, not just reporting, a statement by a judge, judge walton i believe was his name, saying that donald trump had filed a document that contained false information and he had been told before he signed it by john eastman that that document contained false information. that is count 27 of this indictment and john eastman, despite giving him the advice that the information was wrong, did not escape being charged on count 27. and some of, i m not going to read all of the lines, there