Terms mr. Pied biden the president of the u. S. Would agree to be interviewed. And a devastating death toll rising on maui as rescue and recovery teams find more bodies and thousands of residents are homeless along with stranded tourists on an island that looks like a war zone. Good day, everyone, a busy day in washington. Im andrea. Where u. S. District judge Tanya Chutkan made quick decisions this morning on the size and the scope of that protective order in the criminal case surrounding Donald Trumps alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election. In a ruling from the bench, judge chutkan after prosecutors argued that the order was necessary to prevent pretrial publicity and the defense countered that the pregs counsels parameters were extraordinary decided that the protective order would only apply to sensitive materials and not to all of the evidence turned over to them from the Special Counsel. Judge chutkan also added a clause to the order that would limit the universe of people
Company? why would he want them gone? jessica? wh jesse: y would want him gone?m because he was hired to investigate corruptiose he w he was not doing so. he wanted one reason, actually, and that s i think you forget what a great segway. so when devon archer testified beforeinvestig, the oversight. committee, that s exactly what he said he was being aske d about this viktor shokin role. he told them that he was. goodet for burisma, and then he agreed with the statement that shokin didn tem sho pursue corruptionin and investigations against burisma s owner. you shouldvestns againurisma s it takes away.ca that s not true. yes, it is true. dat. the transcrip: yes, true. dan goldman one that s not true. victoria nuland who was the state department s top point person on ukrain land okay. no, she said that shokin was dog doing a good job fightingg crime. john kerrycrime. was saying thee thing that shokin specifically was a good job fightingg corruption all and this is inof june of 20
Possible misinterpretation or interpretation, it was originally reported by the republican read out that archer had suggested something that insinuated improper behavior by the president and his son, and then when archer came out and the transcript came out, it was very clear that he had exonerated the president. that s exactly right. so we saw the transcript and that was our first opportunity to really hold the republicans feet to the fire is and say the way you presented this is not the way it read behind closed doors. dan goldman one of the top democrats on that committee, the way he had cast it was accurate saying, you know, hunter biden wasn t off the hook here. he did sort of the present the illusion of access here, putting his dad on the phone to his buddies, his business associates, but at no point was that conversation focused on any business dealings, and at no point to his knowledge had the president changed any policy based on these conversations or any awareness of what