Present. We condition the presence of racism and not as individual acts of discrimination but as social force. One that has brought us to this particular point in history. Joining me now by skype is stanford establishment e ofessor of psychology st roberts professor roberts thank you for joining us. Ro thank you. Ssor roberts myself included would say we are not racist but you say onthe co use of the term racism is too narrow. How do you and other acemics define racism. We define racism as a system of advantage based on race. We commonly think of racism as mistreating or dicaiking others e of the color of their skin but we define racism as a system and hierarchy and pandemic that we are embedded in. You authored a paper with a white colleague that you outlined seven factors that contribute to racism. We wont get into them but ca you list them for us and talk abt this in detail. We listed the seven factors and many to choose from be clear but we spoke the categories and segregation and
Present. We condition the presence of racism and not as individual acts of discrimination but as social force. One that has brought to this particular point in history. Joining me now by skype is stanford establishment professor of psychology steve you for joing us. Roberts thank thank you. Professor roberts myself included would say we ciare not but you say the common use of the term racism is too narrow. How do you and other academics define racism. We define racism as a system of advantage based on. Ra we commonly think of racism as mistreating or dislikg others because of the color ofr th stem and hierarchy and sm as a pandemic that we are embedded in. You authored a paper with a white colleague that you outlined seven factors that contribute to racism. We wont get into them but can liyo them for us and talk about this in detail. We listed the seven factors and many to choose from to be cleabut we spoke the categories and segregation and hierarchy and power an fascism. Lets take pa
Present. We condition the presence of racism and not as individual on acts of discriminabut as social force. One that has brought us to this particular point in history. Joining me now by skype is stanford establishment professor of psychology Steve Roberts professor berts thank you for joining us. Thank you. Profeor inroberts myself uded would say we are not racist but you say the common use of the term racism oois narrow. How do you and other academics define racism. Sm we define ras a system of advantage based on race. Weommonly think of racism as mistreating or disliking others because of the color of their skin but we define racism as a system and hierarchy and pandemic that we are embedded. You authored a paper with a white colleague that you ntribute to racism. That we wont get into them but can you list them for us and talk about this in detail. We listed the seven factors and many to choose from to clear but we spoke the categories and segregation d hierarchy and power and fas
you know, there s a word for what happened in new york, in a courtroom today. and that word is a latin term. it s bonkers. tonight, on laura coates live. i have been waiting to talk to you guys about this all day. what a day in court today. donald trump clashing with the judge, loudly talking during e. jean carroll s testimony. loud enough to be heard two rows away. claiming it is a witch hunt and a con job. shaking his head, throwing his hands up in the air. i do that, too. it was quite a performance. one that didn t fool the judge, not even for a millisecond or a new york minute, i guess you say. here is something you usually don t hear in a courtroom. the judge says he hopes he won t have to kick trump out of court. and trump responded, i would love it. the judge, i know you would. of course, he likely would. his goal is not maybe to win in court. it s to win at the campaign. frankly, if we re being honest, it s working with him and the polls. let s not forget. this is a
for what happened in new york in a courtroom today. and that is a latin term. it s bonkers. tonight, on laura coates live . i have been waiting to talk to you guys about this all day. what a day in court today. donald trump clashing with the judge, loudly talking during e. jean carroll s testimony, loud enough, by the, way to be heard at least two rows away, claiming its you ve heard these phrases before it s a witch hunt. and it really is a con job. unquote. shaking his head, throwing his hands up in the air oh, wait, i do that to. pulling his hands up in the air it was quite a performance. and it s one that didn t fool the judge, not even for a millisecond, or maybe a new york minute, i guess you say. because here is something you don t usually here in the courtroom. the judge saying that he hopes he won t have to kick trump out of court. and then trump responding, quote, i would love it. the judge, i know you would. of course, he likely would. his goal is actually