american actress and it wouldn t last. some criticism there. it s quite generic. we don t know what they re talking about. to kate s point, looking at more detail about what they re saying with the relationship with the media, there is a conspiracy between royal correspondents and the palace. how you react. whenever there s something difficult, the advice is not to react or feed into the stories. don t react to every news story you don t like. clearly harry and meghan did want more reaction. there is a debate there. what is the best way to deal with constant daily barrage of media attacks? do you respond to every attack or do you not? there are two very divergent communication strategies. that s one huge part of the tension here. you know, everything that meghan had been put through, this idea that other women in the family had been put through as well.
the tax bill now, finally a piece of big legislation, the fact that he has not been able to, i think he wants to, but he s not been able to reach beyond his core support, which bubbles at 35 to 40. how about in the inaugural address, for those who didn t vote for me? yeah, but i don t think it really was the inaugural address that was a problem. his numbers weren t so bad then. it s the constant daily barrage of his crazy. i mean, of his tweets, his claims, his attacks, even on his own allies. he s a kind of destabilizing, daily, cultural presence, and i think that inhibits him and keeps him from growing in terms of his popularity. he seems not to be inviting people in. i think he d like to be inviting people in, but he gets in the way of the success of that endeavor.
points john makes, i happen to think that it s a case of a kind of political malpractice that the president, mr. trump, hasn t, in this current environment of a good economy, having had some real achievements in terms of the court, i would argue regulation, the tax bill now, finally a piece of big legislation, the fact that he has not been able to, i think he wants to, but he s not been able to reach beyond his core support, which bubbles at 35 to 40. how about in the inaugural address, for those who didn t vote for me? yeah, but i don t think it really was the inaugural address that was a problem. his numbers weren t so bad then. it is the constant daily barrage of his crazy. i mean, of his tweets, his claims, his attacks, even on his own allies.
achievements in terms of the court, i would argue regulation, the tax bill now, finally a piece of big legislation, the fact that he has not been able to, i think he wants to, but he s not been able to reach beyond his core support, which bubbles at 35 to 40. how about in the inaugural address, for those who didn t vote for me? yeah, but i don t think it really was the inaugural address that was a problem. his numbers weren t so bad then. it s the constant daily barrage of his crazy. i mean, of his tweets, his claims, his attacks, even on his own allies. he s a kind of destabilizing daily, cultural presence, and i think that inhibits him and keeps him from growing in terms of his popularity. he seems not to be inviting people in. i think he d like to be inviting
having had some real achievements, in terms of the court, i would argue regulation, the tax bill now, finally a piece of big legislation, the fact that he has not been able to, i think he wants to, but he s not been able to reach beyond his core support, which bubbles at 35 to 40. how about in the inaugural address, for those who didn t vote for me? yeah, but i don t think it really was the inaugural address that was a problem. his numbers weren t so bad then. it s the constant daily barrage of his crazy. i mean, of his tweets, his claims, his attacks, even on his own allies. he s a kind of destabilizing, daily, cultural presence, and i think that inhibits him and keeps him from growing in terms of his popularity.