Then they could be retroactively hit with some kind of a fine or Something Like that. That happened to google, 22. 5 million. They said they were not they were honoring blocking Third Party Cookies but were, in fact, hacking around them. It was retroactive. The fcc affirmatively now, under the fact that the Communications Law will cover them as communications as common carriers, they have to make rules. I mean, the ftc never had rules. They didnt have any rulemaking authority. Its all been about host well, before we go any further here, gentlemen, lets bring Howard Buskirk into the conversation, executive Senior Editor of communications daily. What are the concerns of the ispns, what would be your biggest concern . Guest well, and im not here representing any particular isp. I have done a lot of work counseling clients in many different areas, including some isp clients. But i think the concern is if one were to apply the current telecommunication cans privacy rules Telecommunications
Turned them in and this was a suit was brought by Bernie Sanders campaigned very and the reason that they did this is because it is state is going to be close, it is going to be very close. She is joining us from columbus, oh thank you for joining us. Thank you. Here on cspan2, the the communicators with the sec in its regulation of the internet followed by a roundtable discussion of the house energy and Commerce Committee with medical experts about confession research. Later canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau talks about canadian politics and takes questions from students at American University in washington dc. Cspan, created by americas Cable Company 35 years ago and brought bought you as a Public Service by your local cable or satellite provider. It has been about one year since the sec voted to regulate the internet of a public utility. Coming up next is the Net Neutrality saga, a discussion and vote on privacy rules for the internet. Jim halpert is a privacy and cybersecurity
Changes put into these airports, the rationale behind some of this stuff absolutely makes no sense from a security standpoint. Riskbased security is a title thats slapped on everything. And the motto is from the Previous Administration theres never been a risk i wasnt willing to accept. Its like dealing with a Financial Investor. You give a Financial Investor 100,000 of your money and he or she will do things with it they would never do with their own. Thats one example of the logic that goes in and the thought process that goes in. One of my counterparts took a survey over a period of five months with calls that we have with tsa leadership prior to mr. Neffengers arrival. There were 147 topics discussed, not one was security related. They may have talked about playbook or some security aspect but there was always a metric driving it and it was a running joke. This is the priority of that leadership. Let me jump to another point here. Can you walk us through the process that tsa engage
A group of legal and privacy analysts gave differing views on how the roles would affect consumers and businesses at a forum on capitol hill hosted by the congressional internet caucus committee. This is just over an hour. All right, folks. Welcome to another Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory Committee briefing. Thanks, everyone, for coming to this recess briefing. Were going to try to do this really quickly in like one hour and explain this issue from a pro and con perspective. The briefing that youve walked into, in case youre in the wrong place, is the new fcc privacy rules for broadband providers. What will they mean for privacy . And this is hosted by the Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory Committee in conjunction with the congressional internet caucus itself, which is chaired on the house side by congressman Bob Goodlatte and congress wam eshoo and on the senate side by senator john thune and senator patrick leahy. We are super supportive, appreciative of their support a
Peter jim halpert, do you support this rulemaking process, a, and what should be in it . Jim i agree with john that theres confusion right now as to what privacy rules apply and it makes sense for the f. C. C. To move forward and describe what rules its going to apply in greater detail. In terms of what should be in that rule, i think thats really the key question, which well be discussing today. There is considerable disagreement. One can take the view that the internet ecosystem is one whole entity, that i. S. P. s are a particular player in that. But fundamentally in the world of internet advertising, for example, i. S. P. s are a very small player in that market right now. And there ought to be one set of rules, if a consumer has an apple iphone, they dont expect a different set of rules to apply to the Internet Connection that they receive than would apply to the operating system that sees all the traffic going across that phone or any of the apps on the phone. So theres an argume