timing? there were two things. for one, there was a new york times piece that had come out that essentially ran cover for the feds but did it in a way that was counterproductive. it amplified the name of that so it wasn t convenient after revolver had reported that the feds were likely involved. but what i did do is said that ray epps was acting alone and as you can see in this news piece, he seemed to be coordinating with a number of people in this initial breach and many of those people also remained curiously unindicted but perhaps the most thing, the fbi scrubbed his face from their database just a day after revolver ran a report on his fellow oath keeper stuart rhodes who was also unindicted so there is just a cast of curious characters unindicted. tucker: it s a really provocative and very detailed,