validated, yet it was used, used to spy on an american city associated with a presidential campaign. he told us there was no proper predicate for opening the crossfire hurricane investigation, most importantly, he told us the f.b.i., the preeminent law enforcement agency failed in its mission to the rule of law. i think once again the democrats will say we don t care. it doesn t matter. we re never going to stop going after president trump. in fact, eight days ago we saw how far they are willing to go with the indictment of president trump. but frankly this shouldn t surprise us. they told us their objective. in fact it was an agent on the case of crossfire hurricane who told us what their objective was, we all remember the text
the f.b.i. and d.o.j. durham s scathing 300 page report concluded the f.b.i. had really no actual evidence of collusion between the former president and russia when it launched its crossfire hurricane investigation. the gop wants to use the questioning to show the f.b.i., one, wasted taxpayer money to go after a political target. then the former president and then candidate hillary clinton were treated differently. nothing has changed within the f.b.i. despite all its recent reforms. finally, any american out there could be victimized by this agency. democrats including adam schiff are expected to point to the fact that durham s only been able to indict three people with only one conviction. he is not expected to give very long answers and we may not hear an opening statement from him. this is expected to go into the afternoon as members have about
message from peter where he said don t worry, we ll stop trump. it started with the crossfire hurricane investigation, mr. durham has told us how wrong that was, now we have an indictment of a former president who is winning in every single poll by his opinion opponent s justice department. in opinion those two events we had the mueller investigation, impeachment, we had 51 former intel officials falsely tell us the biden laptop was russian disinformation, we had a raid on president trump s home, and, of course, we got alvin bragg s ridiculous case in new york. seven years, nothing has changed. don t believe me? we interviewed a former head of the washington field office when the trump classified document case began. he told the committee interviewed him two weeks ago today, he told the committee that when he asked the department of justice why is there no u.s. attorney assigned
this is ridiculous what s going on. and the country understands that and sees clearly thatdiculs they ve been out to getn president trump inthe co 2016 wt was the trump russia hoax, the crossfire hurricane investigation, 2018, bob mueller, 2020, suppression of the biden laptop story with the 51 former intel officials. and now this. it is wrong and the country . ows it s wrong all right. so you have your colleague james comer is looking into, obviously, the biden family business and how much money. i would love to know we can get a final number. how much money did they make from every country? what did the biden nine family members do to to earn thatmemb money? what services did they offer? did joe himself get a cut? c did he commit any actsom involvd with it? i mean, this is stuff that we now know should have been investigated in 20. , 16? 17? now we have the situation wher e biden has four separate locations, top secret classified informationbide that he had in his possession. and y
way to give an excuse for those people while always finding a reason to go after donald trump because he is the frontrunner in for the 24 election and they are terrified of him becoming president again. rich: another piece of this is the former president in several instances laid out in the indictment is that he showed people who did not have any type of clearance classified information as detailed u.s. invasion plans for iran. i mean, doesn t that go beyond anything we have seen or heard before? the president shopping or showing this stuff around mar-a-lago? well, an indictment doesn t actually tell you what happened. i think. rich: one version of what prosecutors say they have evidence for. that s what they may say. that s why it s so important for the department of justice to have credibility. the department of justice unfortunately now has none. the department of justice has shown time and time again. we have seen it in the crossfire