Special counsel . Eventually can he fire everyone . I mean, its going to be fascinating tomorrow. Were going to hear every one of those questions. What we dont know is how many answers were going to hear. Yeah. That were not sure of. Yeah. This question of Executive Privilege and what theyre going the call Executive Privilege and such a i mean thats a difficult legal theory anyway. Thats not a cut and dried thing even in the best of circumstances, i think were going to get into Appeals Court territory pretty quickly tomorrow. And i have a feeling that Jeff Sessions isnt going to rely on the feelings pleading that we heard last week from dan coats and the director of nsa. It is my feeling that i shouldnt talk about this. I have discomfort. Yeah. Yes. I have a gavel. We will seattle. Thank you, rachel. Thanks. When president nixon fired the special prosecutor investigating him, he did it on a friday night and shocked
headline writers who immediately called it the Saturday Night Massacre.
they did? in the case of biden, fire him or you don t get the billion? i don t want to see the criminal law sean: i didn t ask if you wanted to.do you see potential? i don t see it.i see this is. sean: professor, leveraging our tax dollars and saying fire the prosecutorinvestigating my . it s a bad act.the question , is it criminal? i want to narrow the criminal law, not expand it,on both side. sean: but you don t like it at all? i don t like criminal law being used againstpolitical ener side. sean: do you think it s right for a vice president to leverage of billion tax dollars to get a prosecutor fired? i don t think it s right, but criminal.i don t think it s ri. sean: his son is making a fortune, no experience.none. imagine that. let s apply the criminal law. find out what the statutes are.. sean: i agree with you about prime minister netanyahu.t to get to.
completely inexperienced in any case involving the white house, inexperienced in criminal law being asked by white house staffers do they need lawyers. and of course they do. and here he is telling them no, no, no, you don t need lawyers. that s clearly in violation of the new york bar s rule about his ability to advise people who might be involved in the case that his client is involved in. laurance, i i m not going to opine on the new york bar rules but think how generally inappropriate this is. if this is an employment related question, their advice ought to come from the white house counsel. mr. kasowitz s only professional obligation is to donald trump. so he cap be giving advice to anyone else. note how this is a piece of the standard process of failing to follow the standard legal procedures that keeps getting this white house into more and more trouble. brief examples that link all
house staff. as i just reported according to the new york times, he told aides gathered in one meeting who asked whether it was time to hire private lawyers it was not yet necessary. we re joined by the founder of d.c. report.org a non-profit that covers the trump administration. and walter dahlinger. walter, you have a lawyer, completely inexperienced in any case involving the white house, inexperienced in criminal law being asked by white house staffers do they need lawyers. and of course they do. and here he is telling them no, no, no, you don t need lawyers. that s clearly in violation of the new york bar s rule about his ability to advise people who might be involved in the case that his client is involved in. laurance, i i m not going to opine on the new york bar rules but think how generally inappropriate this is. if this is an employment related question, their advice ought to come from the white house counsel. mr. kasowitz s only professional obligation is to donald trum