including a military plan of attack against an unnamed countrlatacky. trump is accused of directing an aide to move documents out of directina storage before an fbi subpoena. the doj also claiming trump suggested to his lawyer that they should hide or destroy the documentdestroy s. d the former president will appear in federal court tuesday in miami and is proclaiming his innocence. and we have tremendousat was support. h but that was a hoax and a scam.a and nox a scw doing it again, i. just a continuation. seven years time, an innocent man. i did nothing wrong and wee have will fight this out just like we ve been fighting for seven years. it would be wonderfun fighti l if we could devote our full time a again. ecial c special counsel jack smith breaking his silencecosmit but t taking questions on why he decided to indict trump ands com our nation s commitment to the rule of laitw sets an example f. the world we have one set of laws in this country and they apply to
thing. jeannie suk gerson, harvard law professor, thank you for weighing in and you can watch ao missions granted tonight at 9:00 p.m. eastern here on msnbc. that s going to do it for me. o back next saturday. prime weekend is next. welcome to prime time weekend. i m nicolle wallace. let s get right to the week s top stories. underscoring the stakes of the election in november even further, newly released decisions by the u.s. supreme court, the conservative super majority which includes three of the justices hand-picked by donald trump himself overturned a 40-year-old president taking aim at the power of federal agencies to function. the dechevron ruling as the blo puts it, cuts back sharply on s the power of federal agencies to interpret the laws they mr. andrew that courts should rely on their own interpretation of ambiguous laws. the decision will likely have er far-reaching effects across the country environmental regulation to healthcare cost. today also saw the
having, and i think it s very smart and strategic, obviously, ofand stra the california govero be doing it. okay. you know, katy , i have a lot of friends in texas and in southern states wher ie. kids grow up with guns. but it s interesting that newsom alsg thato is thinking at raising the the age of possessing a gunof posse. 18 to 21 is if an 18 year oldpel isn t mature enough, especially if that kid grew ulyp using guns well, they ve also shot that. down ihon the courtst already where they ve tried to raise the limit to 21 for both handgunsor bot and, rifles. you can t do that constitutionally have to allow one or the other, just likdo tht you ban all concealed carry. you have to allow carr oral carl carry some kind of concealed carryri through a permitting you can t just ban at all. right. but in terms of who he s erms o talkinf g to, it is just a political statement. it s not happening. you have to it sstateml amendm a constitutional amendment. it s not something the president
it s so it s not going to be a one size fits all. coast to coast a. but the left doesn t want the voters to have a say and they don t care about facts or principles for them. that that leak of the draft opinion itself orchestrated it sisseminated as it was meant to terrorize, not torr influence. think about this . why would someone leak what was a three month old draft opinion that was already in some form or another coming out probablymi in june anywayng? en and tonight, though, given everything i ve seen, everything i know about the court and its inner workings from the time i clerked, i m going to say that i believe this leak was done with the goal of stoking violence againstju the conservative justices primarily on the courtst. in other words, the goal toe force a change in the courts makeup before the november sounds nefarious.efarious. sounds like a i know it sounds like a totally horrifying prospect, but those
tucker: you are arguing a parallel and different case. i am saying that mayors who say that we are sanctuary cities, and contravention of federal law, saying we are are our in country. we are not subject to the laws passed in washington. you are exaggerating. here is what is going on that is radical. forgive me. trump is legally the president, courtesy of the electoral college favoring rural states to get the constitutional convention passed. and courtesy perhaps of james comey and putin.eg tucker: you re smarter than that.. let me finish. he is legally the president but he is such a blustery demagogue who utters these simplicities and he says, i am right. let s see what the courtst say. one-third less popular than any other president. tucker: this is not a relevant point. you are putting on display the problem itself. you are not actually engaging with the core question, which is, can california behave like