Annual history symposium entitled reconstruction in the long reconstruction to 150 years towards freedom. I am the chief historian, you can call me truck. Please not call me the guy in charge because none of this couldve happened without the involvement of so many here, in this society. It is an all hands, all board operation. Taking charge of the logistics and influencing much of the symposium contacted lauren borchard, the societys director of historical programs, she has helped along by charlotte cummings, and several other Staff Members as well as a whole host, of enthusiastic volunteers. Theyll do this not just once a year, but are not routine races on our Public Program including a noontime lecture series. The next one is coming up on the 29th of may, the other ones is a halfpage red fire on the registration flyer outside and i would like you to encourage you to fill out the questionnaire that you found on the desk in front of you when you came in. I will leave to the society Jan
Test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test the war is about slavery. The Iowa Supreme Court declares segregated schools are unconstitutional under the iowa constitution. So that we have the precursor to brown before there is a 14th amendment. This is clark versus directors of the muska tin schools. Clark will be the u. S. Ambassador to liberia in the 1890s. The long reconstruction is about the changes taking place when a man sues to get his daughter into the Public Schools to be coming in as a u. S. Ambassador to liberia. A year after the war ends, the con fed rats are still running their legislatures and pass black codes and within two years those black codes are all repealed as africanamericans and white unionists begin to take over southern legislature. A revolution in law that takes place, an obvious example to say its now okay for africanamericans and white americans to get married in the south. This is part of the revolution in law in lou
And ill show you the bay bridge coming up. New today, after several highprofile Deadly Police shootings, there is a new bill outlining when police can use deadly force. Today in the bays bob redell joins us live from the newsroom and all thats needed now is Governor Newsoms signature. So whats this about . Correct, kris. Governor gavin newsom is expected to sign a law Assembly Bill 392 which cleared the legislative late yesterday and on its way to his desk for signature. Assuming bill 392 becomes standard, there will be a new when officers can open fire on a suspect, only when the officer needs to defend against imminent threat of death or serious injury to themselves or innocent civilians. The current standard for deadly force is when the officer thinks its reasonable. The new law would elevate to when its necessary. Lawmakers created legislation after public anger over fatal police shootings, including that of stefan clark shot by police after responding responding to a car burglary
One of americas most distinguished judges, and is so well suited to help us cast light on the state of democracy in the judiciary today. Neal katyal, one of americas most distinguished Supreme Court advocates and scholars who also happens to be my brother in law, and now i have to do this. The follow up line, which is we now have a roadshow going around the country called brothers in law. So this is part of that installment, and were much, very much looking forward to weve enjoyed milking this for all its worth for a while. A judge, this is a perilous time for the judiciary. Mount vernon has just commissioned a poll about americans attitude toward democracy in the judiciary. We may be able to call it up a little bit later, but it suggests a tremendous polarization about the way americans see the courts with at the moment. Republicans tending to favorite and democrats less so. Also, division about the way americans think the constitution should be interpreted with democrats more than re
One of americas most distinguished judges, and is so well suited to help us cast light on the state of democracy in the judiciary today. Neal katyal, one of americas most distinguished Supreme Court advocates and scholars who also happens to be my brother in law, and now i have to do this. The follow up line, which is we now have a roadshow going around the country called brothers in law. So this is part of that installment, and were much, very much looking forward to weve enjoyed milking this for all its worth for a while. A judge, this is a perilous time for the judiciary. Mount vernon has just commissioned a poll about americans attitude toward democracy in the judiciary. We may be able to call it up a little bit later, but it suggests a tremendous polarization about the way americans see the courts with at the moment. Republicans tending to favorite and democrats less so. Also, division about the way americans think the constitution should be interpreted with democrats more than re