Cspan your unfiltered view of politics. Up next to house panel looks at the trumpet ministrations actions towards genderbased protections in education, the workplace and healthcare. This labor subcommittee hearing is chaired by donna michi oregon. We are meeting to your testimony on the basis of sex , examining the administrations attacks on genderbased projections. This is a completely virtual hearing and i ask that all microphones for members participating remotely be kept muted as a general rule to avoid unnecessarily background noise. Witnesses will be responsible for muting themselves when theyare recognized to speak or when they wish recognition. Pursuant to House Resolution 1965 and its accompanying resolution members are required to leave their cameras on for the entire time they are in an official proceeding. Even if they step away from the camera. This is an entirely remote hearing and as such the committees hearing room is officiallyclosed. Members who choose to sit with the
Would you take us on the a farm . You know, i am not a farmer. I would have the talk to farmers. Communications people d mine, you deter r know, if they can find somebody willing. Whitaker few people can say they have ever played at the super bowl. Next month shakira adds her name to that list. We went to spain the watch the 53 ball of energy work, mix a new song, and keep the father of her two children, barca star gerard pique, on his toes. He said, im going to win the world cup. Im lesley stahl. Im lesley stahl. Im bill whitaker. Im anderson cooper. Im sharyn alfonsi. Im scott pelley. Those stories and more, tonight, on 60 minutes. ticking Trump Obamacare is a complete and total disaster. Let obamacare implode. Nurse these wild attacks on healthcare hurt the patients i care for. Ive been a nurse in new york for thirty years. I know the difference leadership can make because i saw what Mike Bloomberg did as mayor. Vg help number ofhe uninsured by 40 , covering 700,000 more new yorkers
Enough times. Weve heard them enough times, they werent true then and they arent true now. The majority of economists have always agreed that there was another approach the government could have taken, rather than austerity, and we always argued, and we were right, that austerity was a political choice, not an economic necessity. As recently as march, the Party Opposite ploughed on, saying there was no alternative. To look at them how was no alternative. To look at them now suddenly proclaiming an end to austerity after 125,000 excess deaths as a result, after 100 billion taken out of the economy, after the worst decade for wage growth since the 19th century, just because there may be what . An election round the corner. And after all that, after all that, to deliver what is a pathetic sum to spending departments who are on their knees at the moment. Itsjust adding insult to injury. A government not just callous and uncaring, but hypocritical as well. This isnt a government, its a rack
Please the court, id like quickly to try to reorient the court to marylands case, and then if i can, address some of the concerns that i heard in the argument that you just had. In this case, the court should reverse and vacate for three reasons. The First Amendment retaliation test that was adopted, a single test was used here, fails to provide a management standard because it does not give courts and legislators the means to distinguish between excessive Political Considerations and those deemed constitutionally acceptable. Was this an excessive political consideration . I dont think it was, your honor. Whether the court may like it or not, this is the norm for states where one party receives more than 60 of the vote in congressional elections, those states have a lineup if thats right, then your defense is not really that we cant tell the difference between excessive and nonexcessive. Under measure this is excessive, isnt it . You only need 10,000 votes to do the population measure
House judiciary subcommittee this portion of the hearing includes questions from members starting with the subcommittee chair. It is one hour and 45 minutes. Why should the federal government bear responsibility for economic and social damages . Thank you, chairman cohen. The most obvious reason is because the federal government is complicit. Thisrticle you spoke about time of White Supremacy reference in the headline it is so broad that if i tried to cover in one article it would have been impossible. I focus on a specific thing and that is jim crow and housing discrimination specifically in the city of chicago. The federal government was deeply complicit in housing surrogates in and redlining and the plunder of black homeowners in chicago. It would have not existed if the sha did not have a policy of not ensuring loans for black People Living in chicago. It would not have existed if not for the redlining laps that were written and created by this government of every major city in thi