he didn t say the word hunter but he did shoehorn in what law school you might call a clever or creative way, he shoehorned the president s son into the hearing today and i didn t see the judge respond negatively although she certainly didn t endorse what he was arguing but he shoehorned it in legally by saying but donald trump has attacked hunter biden, how do we not know how do we not know, david, that those attacks on the president s son didn t create a chain of events where the president picked an ag who picked a special counsel who went after donald trump as a, quote, retaliatory measure. it takes a while to explain it as some internet theories do. your response, david? it s interesting because the judge is going to have to decide what to do with this. in order to have to get this motion going anywhere, he s going to have to let specific facts in order to get a hearing on it. because it s going to be very fact specific type of analysis
biden and citing the controversies previewing in court a quote, selective prosecution motion because this prosecution provides an advantage to these prosecutors boss who is running a political campaign against president trump and added it will go directly to the core of the criticisms mr. trump made historically against president biden and his son and whether or not this meaning the jack smith prosecution is a, quote, retaliatory action as a result of that. let me tell you, you don t hear that every day in what is a trial scheduling hearing this is important and want to walk through it because we learned a lot. these defense lawyers have every right to challenge the prosecutor s approach or potential fairness and to make arguments which invoke defendant trump s status as a former president and a current