satisfied until someone, somehow, some way, comes to the opposite conclusion, whether it is an accurate conclusion or not. i think it s actually being used as a litmus test as to whether or not he will support candidates in this state. you have to say that you want a forensic audit, whatever the hell that is, by the way, because it is not a real phrase, right? unless you say you are for one, unless you come to the conclusion that the election must have been stolen and that, somehow, donald trump must have been the real winner in our state, you are not going to get his support for the nomination for any race, no matter whether it s governor of our state or whether, you know, you re running for a local school board. all right. michigan attorney general dana nessel, thank you. thank you for rolling with the audio issues. appreciate hearing from you. in texas, anor in a county d
constitution and all that. but the other one to look at is virginia, which of course you just brought up. it s an interesting issue there, and i think it s kind of a slam dunk legally. the state has said that each county d can decide whether to enforce the provisions of it. so it s an easy argument to make in court that this provides unequal protection under the law. so i think that this one is so blatant. by the way, it has to do with duplicate residences, which is foolish when you think about it because people move around the country all the time. the problem with that case is, you know, trying to purge right before an election, a little dicey because it s usually for political reasons. right? in fact, it s interesting because mccory or mcdonald says, no, actually, this is says this is the politics here are happening as a result of this is in north carolina saying, no, the politics are on the side of the justice department. let s listen far moment. i recently saw a vide