revisit cases that established we know this country well, that is a signal for somebody out there to bring litigation forward, to bring it all the way up to the supreme court. are you afraid that the supreme court will take that step, or try to take that step now that clarence thomas has signaled that he wants to see that, more or less? in fact, that was the impetus for this legislation. we saw in justice thomas s concurring opinion in dobs, but they re gonna be a number of other rights that are taken away from millions of americans. in the same way that this far-right 63 super majority on the court, straightaway the fundamental right to the we wanted to get ahead of the problem, and we did that, but we also know that there are other things on the chopping block. the right to contraception, the right to so many other things that we simply take for granted in our everyday lives. these are the problems that you have because the right has set
this is something when i was growing, up under state law. i m really excited about, this we ve got a lot more work to, do you mentioned some of the challenges, another challenge is that this still does not ensure marriage equality in every single state in the union. and we ve got to go further than what we ve done thus far for that reason. i think some of us who have been watching the story closely, say they alarm bells i started to go off after justices concurring opinion, actor now overturn the opinion. because there is a part where you said that the court should revisit cases that established the rate of same-sex marriage. we know this country well, that is the signal to somebody out there to bring litigation for they can bring its way to the supreme court. are you afraid that the supreme court will take that step.
we quickly began press briefings on a daily basis. i think we served the country well, but but once we went through the early difficult period with covid and the new chief of staff started his tenure, the pressure began a month or so during the pandemic too move away from the briefings. you imply in that book, that that meeting with the lawyers, the campaign lawyers, and rudy giuliani, some of these other lawyers, you concluded that in some ways they helped foment the insurrection on january 6th. that was the moment that they went down the wrong road. is that how you intended it to be read? for me the fuse was lit in mid november. in that phone call by rudy giuliani? no, the oval office was filled with advisers, the president s campaign advisers were there, other senior
he is trying to walk the finest of fine lines, anderson. by distancing himself, criticizing the former president for what happened in the run up to, and especially on january 6th, not just for the country, but for him and his family personally. but then, embracing all of the policies that he believes will serve the country well, from his perspective, but more importantly for his political future will serve him well if he does in fact decide to run, even though he would not go there quite yet with jake. so, for those who are looking for him to express his anger, and not just say his anger, and there is a difference, you are not going to get that from mike pence. it s just not who he is. for those who are looking for somebody to embrace the former president more than he did, you are also not going to get that. so the question is, who is out
POVJESNIČAR UMJETNOSTI VLADIMIR PETER GOSS Kršćanstvo je svojim vrjednotama humaniziralo Europu glas-koncila.hr - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from glas-koncila.hr Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.