whatsoever. okay. thank you. it sound like they re bringing in the jury right now. the jury is coming in and getting situated and then we are waiting. joey, are we going to hear guilty or not guilty? are we going to hear that? this is a civil trial. it s assessed in terms of liability or not liable. liable or not liable. if you re liable you get to the issue of damages which are monetary. if not liable, there s nothing further to discuss. whether amber heard is liable or not liable. first johnny, are you defaming johnny depp and is johnny depp liable to amber heard. the standard of proof is not reasonable doubt. it s a preponderance of the evidence meaning is more likely or not. let s go back into the courtroom. can i have the attorneys roach for a moment. they re discussing something, and we done know what it is, and that s why they do it at side bar. i just want to mention there are seven members on this jury. it s not like a criminal trial. we know that there a
Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd vs Dabur India Ltd & Anr on 9 February, 2024 indiankanoon.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from indiankanoon.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
The Delhi High Court has ruled that its Intellectual Property Rights Division Rules, 2022, do not contain any provision which bars taking additional documents on record after reply or.
The Canadian Intellectual Property Office has announced that as of December 1, 2023, updates to the Practice Notices for trademark opposition proceedings and section 45 (non-use.
because they found all three of the statements that johnny depp was alleging as defamatory to be true, to be that they were defamatory, essentially i think is really a finding on the credibility of amber heard, how they felt she came across on the stand. because it s essentially that they rejected what she said to be as true. remember, two of these statements are very vague. they just allege domestic abuse, which could be financial or mental or verbal, and it seemed like there was a lot of evidence even outside of amber heard s testimony that supported that there was some type of abuse, verbal or mental going on, even whether we get to the physical or the sexual or not. so it seems like they sort of rejected amber heard out of hand. however, when you get to the fact that they also found one of the defamatory statements alleged by amber heard in her counter statement, her counter suit to be true as defamatory, then it almost seems like it s