comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Counsel for opposite party - Page 3 : comparemela.com

Production Of Defence Witness | Power Of Court Vs Right Of Accused: Allahabad High Court Explains Scope Of Sections 311 & 233 CrPC

The Allahabad High Court recently explained the difference between the scope of Section 311 CrPC [Power to summon material witness, or examine person present] and Section 233 CrPC [Entering upon.

Anupam-singh
Ambedkar-nagar
Nadeem-murtaza
Mayank-pandey
Kailash-chandra
Justice-jyotsna-sharma
Supreme-court
Counsel-for-opposite-party
Additional-district
Sessions-judge
Opposite-party
Home-and-anr

Contention Of Accused About False Implication Cannot Be Examined In Section 482 CrPC Proceedings: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has observed that while deciding the application under Section 482 CrPC, the High Court cannot examine the contention of the accused that he/she has been falsely implicated.

State-of-uttar-pradesh
Uttar-pradesh
India
Sitapur
Kumar-awasthi
Bhupendra-singh-bisht
Justice-subhash-vidyarthi
Nahar-singh
Ankit-tripathi
Kadapala-sreyes-reddy
High-court
Counsel-for-opposite-party

Criminal Proceedings Can't Be Quashed Merely Because Allegations Also Disclose A Civil Dispute Between Parties: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has observed that a charge sheet and the criminal proceedings against an accused cannot be quashed merely because the allegations may also disclose a civil dispute between.

Delhi
India
Justice-subhash-vidyarthi
Ravindra-kumar-yadav
Ajeet-singh
Suniti-sachan
Keshav-ugan-jha
Priti-saraf
Counsel-for-opposite-party
Apex-court
High-court
Top-court

Proceedings Under 'UP Gangsters Act' Liable To Be Quashed Upon Acquittal Of Accused In Base Cases Of Gang Chart: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has held that once the proceedings of the base cases depicted in the gang chart are quashed or the accused has been acquitted, the proceedings under the Uttar Pradesh .

Uttar-pradesh
India
Paritosh-kumar-malviya
Justice-ajay-bhanot
Salim-piyaoo
Swapnil-sinha
Jai-prakash
Abdul-kadeer-khan
High-court
Counsel-for-opposite-party
Anti-social-activities
Sessions-trial

Arms Act 1959 | Firing A Pistol In Self-Defence Doesn't Violate License Condition: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has observed that firing a pistol in self-defence does not violate license conditions. With this, the Court ordered the release of a pistol in favour of the applicant, who.

Lucknow
Uttar-pradesh
India
Umang-rai
Sagar-singh
Ishan-baghel
Rakesh-kumar-singh
Justice-subhash-vidyarthi
Sunil-dutt-tripathi
Sachin-sharma
Counsel-for-opposite-party
High-court

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.