have received anything, is simply wrong. and it really doesn t recognise that this is an ageing generation who were so badly wronged by home office failures. the home affairs committee s report refers to the excessive burden on claimants, inadequate staffing and long delays, with concerns that many are still too fearful of the home office to apply at all. four years on from the windrush scandal, the committee notes the vast majority of people who applied for compensation have yet to receive a penny. what is this, what s going on? are you anthony brian? yes? what s this about? anthony brian, i m arresting you on suspicion of being an illegal resident. what you talking about, illegal? this tv drama tells the story of one windrush victim, anthony brian, who was almost deported, and his wife janet mckay who spent her life savings fighting to keep her husband in the uk. i just think they re
scheme, this process to try to give people compensation. i wonder when you were giving evidence to mps on the home affairs select committee, where you fully aware at that stage of these insensitivity is and how much the scheme was really failing to deliver? , ., , ,., , ., to deliver? yes, absolutely. you know, i to deliver? yes, absolutely. you know. i have to deliver? yes, absolutely. you know, i have been to deliver? yes, absolutely. you know, i have been involved i to deliver? yes, absolutely. you know, i have been involved with| know, i have been involved with windrush claimants from the beginning so for years on we are seeing the same in transience, the same inflexibility, the same owners request for evidence, the lack of communication with applicants and claimants. the very problems that cause the windrush candle in the first place. the very problems that were highlighted in the windrush review that suggested the home office needs to changes in structure and leads to changes
representatives, the lawyers and the claimants who all come under the windrush banner with total contempt. i mean, there is absolutely no funding for lawyers to do this work. i don t think there would be any of the scheme like this where, you know, the claimants couldn t access lawyers of their choice. in the community groups out there and they are picked up the pieces, these tiny grassroots, not the big ones. there is one in nottingham, tiny community groups are doing this work and they can t even apply for tiny pot of money that the home office has set aside because. money that the home office has set aside because. . . aside because. workers excluded from that- aside because. workers excluded from that- m aside because. workers excluded from that. i m so aside because. workers excluded from that. i m so sorry, aside because. workers excluded from that. i m so sorry, we - aside because. workers excluded from that. i m so sorry, we are i aside because. workers excluded from t