alhambra, california, just outside los angeles. the video is slowed down somewhat. the man in the frame is the 72-year-old mass kill here had already carried out a mass shooting at another ballroom in nearby monterey park. the weapon he s carrying, according to authorities, is a .9 millimeter ingram mac ten semi-automatic with what appears to be a suppressor or silencer which authorities say he was making at home. brandon tells us he heard sounds, metal on metal noises. you can see the shooter pulling back and then for a few seconds, he withdraws into the doorway as if to look around, at which point, seconds later, you see brandon entering there. his man outstretched, reaching for the man and then the weapon. we re just seeing this for the first time. we ve never seen this video before. brandon will describe in a moment what he was doing and thinking in the seconds that we see and what we don t see. again, the killer has a mac ten, apparently a suppressor in stock. he had alr
silencer, which authorities say he did make an at home. branded tsai tells us he heard sounds, metal on metal noises, you could see the shooter pulling back on the weapon. then, for a few seconds, he withdraws into the doorway. as it look around. at which point, seconds later, you see brandon they re entering and confronting the man. his arms outstretched, reaching for the man with a weapon. struggle moves into the doorway just outside that room. we are just seeing this for the first time. we ve never seen this video before. brandon will describe in a moment just what was happening. what he was doing and thinking in the seconds that we see, and what we don t see. the killer has a mccann, apparently a suppressor and stop, he had already killed ten people. and 11 victim died today, he may have taken many more lives had the scene we were watching played out otherwise. had brandon not gotten the gun and given the gunman, who later took his own life, away. we are gonna be joined s
constituted itself. we expect that will be one of the first things they dig into once they are constituted. who decides? does the committee get to decide? is that something mccarthy has say over? whether the committee actually chooses to take this up? so the ethics committee is split evenly between democrats and republicans with the nonpartisan staff? as the majority leader, as the speaker of the house, kevin mccary would have significant sway. that s where some of these issues related to his own knowledge of george santos lies come in. he has a conflict of interest if in fact as has been reported he knew about some of santos lies, still sponsored a fund-raiser with him, still concealed those lies from the voters in order to win that seat in the win at any cost view that he has. what does that mean? if powerful republicans knew there were lies, influence the
stefanik. have you heard anything about an ethics committee investigation? the ethics committee has not yet been constituted itself. we expect that will be one of the first things they dig into once they are constituted. does the committee get to decide? is that something mccarthy has say over? the ethics committee is split evenly between democrats and republicans. kevin mccarthy would have significant sway. that is where some of these issues related to his own knowledge of george santos s lies come in. he has a conflict of interest if in fact as has been reported he knew about some of santos s lies, still sponsored a fund-raiser with him, still concealed those lies from the voters in order to win that seat in the win at any cost view that he has. what does that mean?
if powerful republicans knew there were lies, knew that the lies, still sponsored a fund-raiser with him, still concealed those lies from the voters in order to win that seat in the win at any cost view that he has. what does that mean? if powerful republicans knew there were lies, knew that the veracity of things he had said did not play out, was it that they just wanted the seat? they just wanted the flip and they needed as many seats as they could get. these are good questions that at least stefanik should be asked. it s one thing for a fabulist like george santos to lie and cheat his way into a congressional seat. it s all together something else when he is doing it in