The Special Counsel handled that investigation out to someone else. His focus remains on what he was charged to do. Tucker this falls into the distinction of a difference category. We are less than a year on this thing. Weve got 22 indictments, 100 felonies, 13 russians by the way and of five guilty pleas, thats a pretty Good Days Work and i think we should let him finish his job. Tucker are all guilty pleas the same . Is pleading guilty of lying to a federal agent the same as quitting with a Foreign Government or are they different universes . Of course not, but they may be going lately on these guys to get their cooperation, time will tell. I think its absolutely fair to say this Special Counsel ought to deliver or wind up his work. Benghazi took two years, i think thats way too long, but ill tell you what. Indicting 13 russians for interfering with the election is exactly what he was charged to do, im glad they were indicted, i hope you are. Tucker lets be totally real. None of thes
yet it can affect your life immensely, is not as any federal law. today it s gun makers, you might be slipping that. what if tomorrow, it s someone you agree with or anyone who holds ideas that our leaders find threatening? pro-life, opposed to immigration, suspicious of wall street? corporate america isn t comfortable with those, so suddenly, you take out a car loan or a mortgage or fill in the blank. a version of this is happening in china on a very large scale. those who disagree are punished in the marketplace. this is significant because our corporate elites love china, it s a model for them. there s no messy democracy to contend with and people get rich. in china, corporate power is the same as political power. companies work together and ordinary people obey because they have no choice. suddenly, america is moving in that direction. it s ominous. bank of america artist it to banking. that does a good job at that and it s safer for everybody when
they stay in their lane. thanks for coming on. always a pleasure. tucker: i understand you agree with the aims of this, progressive groups apply pressure to corporate america. i get that you like the outcome. can you see that democracy dies a little bit when this is how we solve our political differences? why if you want to change gun laws, wouldn t you in full view of the rest of the country go to congress and make your case? you re not doing that, are you? what i agree with those with the majority of his country agrees with and that is the fact that we need to do something about this issue of guns in this country to prevent another mass shooting from happening. i agree with 75%. tucker: i just want to be clear, those numbers don t mean
your life immensely, as much as any federal law. today it is gun makers. you might be celebrating that. but what if tomorrow it is someone you agree with? or anyone who holds ideas that our leaders find frightening? pro-life are you? suspicious of wall street? corporate america isn t comfortable with those views. suddenly you can t get a car loan or a mortgage or fill in the blank. a version of this is happening in china on a very large scale. citizens there are rated on the basis of their obedience to the prevailing orthodoxy. those who disagree are punished in the marketplace. this is significant because our corporate elites love china. it s a model for them. there is no messy democracy to contend with and people get rich. in china, corporate power is the same as political power. ideologues. and companies work together.r ordinary people obeyed because they have no choice. suddenly america is moving in that direction. it is d ominous. bank of america autistic to banking. it isrt a goo
charged with trying to blow up an american airlines plane with explosives hidden in his underwear. he s acting as his own attorney. violence between egypt s christians and muslims may lead to new legal protection for religious minorities. a group described as thugs attacked christian protestors. that happened on sunday. at least 25 people were killed after the army and police got into the mix. well, egypt s prime minister says he s going to push a law that is making religious discrimination a crime. but experts say there is only so much that he can do during military rule. the problem, john, is we ve got 24 men, that s the supreme council of the armed forces. they re like the wizard of oz. they re behind a curtain. they re ruling egypt without any responsibility. so they have the power and no responsibility, and then you have this prime minister, a decent man, who has the responsibility but he s got no power. egypt has set parliamentary elections for november 28, and a