of illegal migrants. less than five months from now and we re going, and i ll tell you what we have to change the system. we have to straighten out what s going on in these courts. we got a rigged deal going, this whole country, and we ve got to do it. and those appellate courts have to step up and straighten things out, or we re not going to have a country any longer. but we re going to win the great state of arizona, and we re going to tell crooked joe biden, you re fired you re doing a lousy job, the worstjob the worst president in history. joe, you fired! our correspondent emma vardy, was at that rally in phoenix and gave us this update there were several thousand people queuing outside this building in extreme temperatures. and infact, over1,000 people didn t get in. some people were taken to hospital by emergency services. but for the people who did make it inside this event, the energy is very high, the volume is very high. they re clearly also relishing the op
and scrutinise tonight. but ijust wanted to remind you of some of the contentious claims that have dominated the week so far and why you should be aware of them. this was the most contentious claim from tuesday s debate the prime minister s claim that under labour tax will go up £2,000. that statement, though, is misleading. the 2000 firstly, is over four years. it s about £500 a year. it s also based on political assumptions. some of them are dubious. labour have said they won t put up income tax, national insurance or vat, but labour have a dubious claim of their own. this one that there s a £71 billion gap in the conservative spending plans. the problem is that s based on the assumption that the conservatives will do things that they ve said they won t, like scrapping national insurance in the next few years. so if either of these claims tonight, it is fair to be sceptical. now we don t know for sure what is going to come up this evening, but the cost of living is an issue the pa
to crackdown on the sale of loose cigarettes, because the city was losing tax revenue. so the mayor chose tax revenue over eric garner s life. go ahead, wesley, what did you want to say? i was going to add that was something that came out in the administrative trial that was really interesting, right, that this order one of the things about these cases is we very often don t find out all the details until well later on. so when this administrative trial happened, there was testimony that the reason eric garner was stopped that day was because the command staff had called their officers in, had ordered a crackdown on loose cigarettes. that day a lieutenant had called into the precinct and said i see some guys on the corner, go check it out. it speaks to, again, the interaction one way or the other. it speaks to high-level policing decision ands priorities can start to create these on the ground moments. again, someone, a high-ranking officer at n.y.p.d., because of what he had bee