They don t have the ability to rule on every single issue in life, but that s what they are doing. steve: those who long advocated to put justices on the court who follow the constitution it wasn t because they wanted specific outcomes. but they wanted to reverse the process susan just described. we want it to operate the way the country was supposed to operate like. they want the job of the supreme court justices to be confining themselves to their authority under the constitution. marbury versus madison which laid out the authority of the supreme court, and not to go beyond the authority of the court and encroach on the legislative branch and become
They don t have the ability to rule on every single issue in life, but that s what they are doing. steve: those who long advocated to put justices on the court who follow the constitution it wasn t because they wanted specific outcomes. but they wanted to reverse the process susan just described. we want it to operate the way the country was supposed to operate like. they want the job of the supreme court justices to be confining themselves to their authority under the constitution. marbury versus madison which laid out the authority of the supreme court, and not to go beyond the authority of the court and encroach on the legislative branch and become
They don t have the ability to rule on every single issue in life, but that s what they are doing. steve: those who long advocated to put justices on the court who follow the constitution it wasn t because they wanted specific outcomes. but they wanted to reverse the process susan just described. we want it to operate the way the country was supposed to operate like. they want the job of the supreme court justices to be confining themselves to their authority under the constitution. marbury versus madison which laid out the authority of the supreme court, and not to go beyond the authority of the court and encroach on the legislative branch and become
Conservatives say we work better in our plans? i don t know if it should be a right or not. last time i checked the constitution it wasn t in there, that being said, neil ui did reach out to my doctor clients and the response was exactly that. you know, they can t refuse care so the cost is increasing. the private hospitals are are taking those costs and passing them onto insurance companies which is passed on to the individual. so maybe what we do is not going global market action overnight to a single payer, maybe we go to a broad-base basic care to accessible to every individual where they participate in the cost a little bit but then also offer to the private payers and the private hospitals that another level of care, a two-tier system, if they want to choose their own doctors and want a different kind of care, they can afford to do so and therefore you re doing the