weapons of mass destruction, strong deterrence against that including not just retaliatory strike but something that really makes people understand that any short-term gain that they made by using chemical weapons will be more than obliterated by response. that does not mean that we need to go to war against a country that s using them, though. neil: donald trump was going to be a president who was going to extract the u.s. from the region because we got overinvolved just like george bush concerned about nationing building, barack obama wanted to extract ourselves from the iraq conflict. each all dragged back in but we really can t get out of this, can we? there s different ways to look at it. it s certainly true that the u.s. is going to be involved in a global sense and no way to step back and have things work out fine. at the same time i think that much of the support that donald trump had and received was as a
does it look right now that health care and a rework might be delayed if not denied? oh, i am glad to see that they re going to still try and hit the ball and rework this, obamacare does need improvements and as far as it being a right, i would i would assert that it already is a right. anybody can walk to any emergency room right now and they cannot get they cannot be refused treatment, however, the cost of that is insane and it s driving up everything for all of us. so a single-payer health care would help all of us and increase the cost or excuse me, the quality of the care and decrease the costs. neil: well, you hope. we don t have single-payer yet and we might be going that direction, costs have gone up inmeasurably, kimberly, i wonder what that means and some con
their prey must be given enemies pause. when i realized what this technology can do and how far it has advanced in the last years, if i m sitting in north korea and syria i have to be rethinking my strategy a little bit, right? i would definitely agree with that. our nation s military might and power, it goes far beyond the stretches of what our enemies minds can reach. i do not necessarily agree or disagree with the method of attack, that s our president, our commander in chief and our military has to stand behind that. i just hope and pray that we have an exit plan, exit strategy and not end up something like iraq or afghanistan and be in a war for another 10 to 15 years. neil: sometimes with an awesome reach of power, the idea is, you know, that it will give your enemies pause and think twice. we learned in iraq and other places that sometimes they just continue doing what they re
act and standing in the process ed in washington on more of russian response to all of this. rich. good morning, neil, russia has invested in keeping ally in power, president bashar al-assad, condemned the u.s. strike and warned of consequences. a russian warship was heading in the direction where ships launched. meanwhile, russian officials continue criticizing the u.s. strike. they say violated international law. of course, i am upset that all of this brings more damage to already strain relations between russia and the united states but i hope the provocations will not lead to irreversible consequences.
chemical of mass destructive weapons basing it on un studies is held to pay, putting your trust in an institution which they get wrong of disappearance of no chemical weapons. right. that s an incon an an annual promise made in treaties has not worked and we have seen as a result. neil: you can t trust united nations whether you re making a large statement about reliability in general, then it comes back on us, come back on us to do what we did yesterday and maybe do so again and again