they ll report to the state election board, and that will be the answer. so i want to ask you something else. you talk about integrity counts and you ve been very clear about that, and you have stood up courageously to the president when others would not, certainly not publicly. but you did say recently you wouldn t comply if the january 6th congressional committee subpoenas you. obviously january 6th is related to the former president and the big lie. so explain to me why you wouldn t comply if they wanted to talk to you. just what s your logic? well, we wanted to see if they re going to issue a subpoena. i feel like i had a conversation with president trump. it s a one-hour conversation. it s all out there in the public domain. we really right now are focused on implementing all the election law changes that we had with s.b. 202. we have a lot of elections this fall with our municipal elections. we have work to do here, and so if this is just going to be a sideshow up in washingt
than one incident. she made a complaint in good faith about a series of inappropriate behaviors and unwanted advances from the ceo. she and her husband see no value in revisiting this matter now or discussing it further publicly or privately. in fact it would be painful to do so. the fact there are multiple complaints tell me it s more likely than not there was some sexual harassment activity by this man at that time. georgia businessman, he s in washington, he said nothing about the allegations that threaten his cam pin but mr. cain was in his trademark playful mood as he spoke earlier to a conversation gathering. before i get started, i want to know whose telers are these in i don t need them. several other new developments we need to share. the came campaign, threaten sue the website that first published the allegations. launching a new tv ad, blaming liberals and the news media for stirring talk of scandal and suggesting race is a factor. they can t argue with