a somewhat different take. reporter: the military has not lessened its concern one bit about civilian casualties but pointing the finger at isis when they take human shields. we were doing very well in iraq. reporter: rash comments on the war in iraq from president trump. he may have meant them as more ral blooster in chief. but it seems a peculiar time. the really hard fighting occurred with the invasion of iraq in 2003, 2004, 2007. roiptd the comments come just after word of a formal investigation into u.s.-led air strike in mosul after more than 100 civilian deaths.
we re back with congressman adam schiff. now in turmoil as the parallel probe in the senate is moving forward. chairman devin nunes says the hearing probably won t hold any hearings until after the easter recess. that s almost a month away. do you believe he is trying to delay any serious progress in this investigation? it certainly is deeply disappointing if that s the pog he is taking because there s no reason to delay the hearing that we had scheduled for this week. as we were talking about earlier, if this is all about trying to avoid sally yates testifying. the public is in favor of it. there is no reason it put it off. i think in addition to sally yates testimony we will learn from clapper and brennan about
confidence not the sort of amateur hour that unfolded the last several dayes with congressman nunes and i think that s the way he wanted it. they are saying rebecca they are open to subpoenaing documents, individuals they said internationally, that s different. you can t subpoena something overseas. what might they be trying to access? in terms of overseas international subpoenas or information they would potentially want, you re looking at potential russian connections. investigations. you re not going to get those. you re not going to get those, no. i think that shows the limitations of the senate intelligence investigation because while they can subpoena documents domestically while they can call witnesses domestically, this is an investigation that goes beyond our borders and that s why the fbi investigation is going to be able to perhaps to accomplish a little bit more and reach a more of a conclusion. you did hear the vice chairman and senator from virginia say he would
that here and with those tax returns rel stroont that then i think we pursue them but i wouldn t, you know, get too far ahead of that. will you subpoena white house visitor logs to try to determine with whom the chairman met at the white house to review those sensitive dock snmts. i hope the chairman will decide that he will not forthcoming on what he saw, who he saw it with, and whether they have any relationship to the white house. we do need to get to the bottom of it. otherwise there will be this permanent cloud hanging over our investigation. sounds like have you a very important meeting tomorrow face-to-face with the chairman. we will see where this investigation goes following that meeting. good luck. thank you. thank very. for coming in. you bet. adam schiff of the intelligence committee. we will take a quick break. much more right after this. your insurance company
not. i hope we can find a way to get this investigation fully moving again for our part as democratic members. we are plowing ahead. continuing to review the documents and making our witness list and planning to go forward. as of right now, you don t even know what documents were that he reviewed at the white house. do you have any reason to believe that chairman and the source he had at the white house broke any rules by going through those documents? i really don t know, wolf. all i do know is that the source within the white house compound raised a question about whether this is being done credibly or whether it is being done in concert with the white house. and given that it s associates of the president who are some some respect subjects of this investigation, that just can t be credibly continued this way. you and the chairman have the