Probably the biggest illegality so far, the biggest collusion so far. Or conspiracy. Completely made up, completely made up. Led to nothing. Except several fraudulent fisa wires. And now we have mueller who doesnt seem to care that hes sitting on top of a totally illegitimate investigation. But the thing about the dossier that she paid for and the fact that the fbi paid steele, it was designed to misinform the American People with russian lies, to influence the election. Yes. There is a great irony here if it wasnt maybe if mueller and his band of whatever they are, democrats, right . Were fair minded, maybe theyd investigate maybe thats the collusion. Maybe thats the collusion. Oh, my god. Rudy needs to check his Carbon Monoxide monitors. The sure Sign Team Trump knows there are problems. Look over there, the collusion, the obstruction, theyre
The latest Political Developments of the day and interviews with top newsmakers are featured. That is sort of what is at the core of all of thi
concludes what the mueller investigation has turned into is an effort to describe the president s lawful exercise of his constitutional authority as some kind of obstruction of justice. rick: so it become something completely different than what it was originally intended to be. yeah, absolutely. this fence now, again, this is according to what s been reported. maybe not true. but based on what we know, the effort is to say that when president trump said as president obama had about hillary clinton, that mike flynn s conduct didn t warrant a huge prosecution. that the argument for mueller seems to be this is obstruction of justice. it s not. the president is not accused of destroying documents or urging witnesses to lie. he runs the justice department. is he the president. if people don t like the way is he running the justice department, they should vote for somebody else in 2020 or urge his impeachment but it s not a crime. trace: mueller s team has
virginia coming back from lunch with chewing gum in my mouth. not a crime against humanity. but the judge was upset with me and called me to the bench. at the bench out of the earshot of the jury asked me to get rid of the gum, handed me a tissue and discreetly and politely took care of the, quote unquote, problem. judge ellis can do that. every time he is concerned about something one of the counsel does, he can call them to the bench. he doesn t have to berate people in front of the jury. that s the problem here. chuck, this is a nonlawyer who s never appeared in front of judge ellis. what seemed weird to me is that all of his conduct seemed to be in one direction. it was all hostile from the prosecution. so from the outside looking in, he accused of lead prosecutor of having tears in his eyes. he banned the word oligarch. the clients that paul manafort have are all oligarchs. the conduct didn t just seem grouchy or cantankerous just to push back a little bit on your thesis, it s
finish. you re watching people this is not the first time that they ve conducted themselves in this manner. and you kind of wonder why there is a lawnessness in this community. is this the first time a company has broken into a window and stole something? the first time they threw rocks at police? first time they shot at police? started fires and looting? no. this conduct didn t start because you had a law-abiding citizen that all of a sudden got caught up and now i m going to turn into a criminal. these are people that have all of these lying in wait for this opportunity. some are citizens that live there. some aren t. but to say that they didn t start out in the peaceful demonstrations is something that you cannot say. neither can i.
some peaceful protestors do fade in the background. but they re interchangeable. no they re not, mark. they re not. for anyone watching. richard? richard? listen to me. people are not interchangeable with rioters and looters. that is absurd. whether it is is whether whether. richard richard, let me finish. you re watching people this is not the first time that they ve conducted themselves in this manner. and you kind of wonder why there is a lawnessness in this community. is this the first time a company has broken into a window and stole something? the first time they threw rocks at police? first time they shot at police? started fires and looting? no. this conduct didn t start because you had a law-abiding