They allow people to vote inr s. their states. what i think would be something that some red states could could propose is , well, okay, if if tomocrat voters choose to play these blue states whereg they cannot tolerate the living conditions, they don t want conditions want these types horrible things and they really change their mind on the types of policiet theys that they supe well, oncess they move to amaybo red state, guess what?n tomaybe you don t get to vote f, five years. okay, a well, first of all, a law prohibiting american citizens who have not committed a crimwoule from voting would probably not withstand legal scrutiny.l scrutiny. and, second, how would like a and second, how would this, like a national divorce be good for conservatism? now, why would we want embrace to embrace the states that gave jimmy carter and bill clinton, but essentially give up bill clinon the states that gae us reagan and trump a mention of duncan had given upr on virginia? or if republicans in
Alternative, which is a horrdous war. i said that in the opening, dana exactly. and you re totally right. exactly, it s like how you talk to your kid rk i d talk to my almost 7-year-old, just because somebody said this been you didn t make it right for you to i think that s the case right now i don t think we should fall to the trap by saying the only alternatives are nuclear war or the kind of diplomacy that donald trump is conducts where he s making a lot of concess and not getting anything back. i m all about engaging in north korea but do it firmly. i don t think you law the dictatorship of we can keep doing what we were doing and that was not working. i think the president has dealt with kim i think your right.