Is very successful it is tremendous business of the United States people were riveted by it and when you look at. The top to many of the toxins important. To remain single thing whatever it may be i just wish that they understood that they talk really does like to have an impact on our world today the United States has to be compensated well compensated because we are the ones that are make it possible. Coming up israel goes back into full lockdown following the surging coronavirus case since the new restrictions will be in force for 3 weeks. And everybodys and rates and theres a sense of confusion i feel it is a mistake it wasnt my pad it was no exit strategy from the last look down and now we enter another cycle of id say. Well the us is announced plans to ban the use of the chinese own to mobile apps and we chat citing National Security concerns a download in the apps in the u. S. Will be blocked that will be blocked from sunday with a full ban due in mid november imposed on the van
Polls in our place down the dangers even as climate scientists writes the law. Im anthony how and welcome israel is very imposing a full nationwide lockdown with authorities they saying its the only way to slow soaring corona virus infections the measures will severely restrict movement for 3 weeks they come into effect as israel mocks the jewish new year and several other religious holidays critics cite the need for a 2nd measure is the direct result of the 1st lockdown being lifted too soon. Midday in jerusalem shortly before festivities get underway its. The jewish new year but the. Streets are empty. The country 2nd lockdown has just begun and despite the Festive Season visits to relatives in other neighborhoods are banned israel has been registering around 6000 new covered cases a day in a country of 9000000 people thats a lot and it gives it one of the highest rates of infection in the world according to the Prime Minister Health Care Officials have declared code red. In the last
Throughout the u. S. And the world with interactive maps. Watch ondemand anytime unfiltered at cspan. Org coronavirus. I am very delighted to welcome you to our event today. Its on a conservative case for class actions, a book written by professor fitzpatrick that galvanized this debate. We have three outstanding speakers, panelists i should say. Our first is the head of the class action practice here it gets indented coach rivera key has litigated in the fitted doubtless class actions including over 20 dismissals of class action cases. So you may have a sense of where his position is on that. He is a graduate of georgetown, undergraduate and the university of Virginia Law School where he was the long review and hes also the author of a chapter in the popular better guide series on 1702 and claims, so please welcome christopher. [applause] our next panelist is professed himself wrote the book. He is a graduate of notre dame where he was runnerup valedictorian, but he made up for that w
The Heritage Foundation hosted this event where panelists debated the pros and cons of existing laws. Good afternoon. My name is david azerrad, director of the simon center principles and politics and the Family Foundation fellow here at the Heritage Foundation. Its my pleasure to welcome you to the Heritage Foundation for this panel discussion. The freedom of the press as all americans know is enshrined in the First Amendment. A free press is a necessary component of republican selfgovernment and a hallmark of a free society. That is not in question. In fact, its a nonnegotiable. Free speech, however, is not the exclusive prerogative of the press. The First Amendment you will remember protects the freespeech rights of all americans, not just those who so happen to have an in a in journalism. The prez, in other words, is itself subject to free speech just like everyone else is. Journalists do not take well to criticism and i say this as recovering journalist myself. There is a tendency
Free speech is the prerogative of the press. It protects the free speech writes of all american, not just those who so happen to have a name in journalism. The press, in other words, is itself subject to free speech just like everyone else is. Journalist, however, do not take well to criticism and i say this as a recovering journalist myself. There is a tendency in the media to equate criticism of the press, however well founded with an attack on the freedom of the press itself, but i think you can be committed to free speech while attacking those who abuse it. Whats more, the freedom of the press like all freedoms is not without limits. There are no prior restraints on publication. Those days are thankfully, long behind us, but the press is responsible for what it says especially if it defames an individual. Libel laws are also an integral part of a free society. In the 1964 Landmark Supreme Court ruling of New York Times b. Sullivan, the Supreme Court considerably raised the burden o