Live Breaking News & Updates on Community Defenders|Page 2
Stay updated with breaking news from Community defenders. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Two people were injured as a result of shelling in nikopol, dnipropetrovsk region. A 21yearold girl and a 49yearold man were hospitalized. This was reported by the head of the region, serhii lysak. The occupiers hit the city with artillery, as a result of the attack , a twostory residential building was destroyed. Private homes, farm buildings and infrastructure were damaged. Also damaged gas pipeline and lines. And the occupiers attacked zaporozhye in the afternoon, hitting an industrial facility. The head of the region, ivan fedorov, reported on the six wounded. In the meantime, Volodymyr Zelenskyi held the supreme commanderinchief bid. At the meeting with the military command, they discussed the defense of kharkiv against russian attacks and the restoration of Electricity Supply in the city, as well as the possibility of strengthening air defense in the region. In ....
The region, ivan fedorov. And at night, the russians released 17 shaheds across ukraine. All destroyed our air Defense Forces in the kharkiv, dnipropetrovsk and poltava regions. The drones were launched from the temporarily occupied crimea. The enemy also hit with a kh31 guided air missile from the temporarily captured Luhansk Region and an iskandarm Ballistic Missile from the occupied crimea, the air force said. The attack was repulsed by aviation and antiaircraft missile units. Fire groups and means of radioelectronic warfare. Three people were injured as a result of the russian attack by shaheds in kharkiv. An elderly man received shrapnel injuries, and another woman man. They were given medical assistance on the spot. 10 private houses, a kindergarten, three fivestory buildings and three cars were damaged , oleg s ....
Beverly so, we will go ahead and get started since the moment has arrived. Others may trickle in from lunch, but thank you and welcome here to this panel on the Church Committee at 40. My name is beverly gage. I am a history professor at yale. And i will be up here mostly timekeeping and asking some questions. Before i introduce the panelists, i just wanted to say a few words about the genesis of this panel, the idea behind it and some of the issues i hope we are going to be able to address. So this year, 2015, marks the 40th anniversary of one of the most important congressional committees certainly of the 1970s. And i think arguably of the latter half of the 20th century and that was the Church Committee. The Church Committee which was chaired by Senator F ....
Shere will be downstream impact though that is not the principal purpose. If we do nothing, what is the likelihood in your country that last year all assad will use chemical weapons as a routine weapon to turn the tide of the civil war . The likelihood is very high. He would use them again. Mr. Secretary. I agree completely. I may even put it out 100 . Should go check the intel on it. I think you will be convinced. Probably 100 . If you are right, that it is 100 we will see them used routinely in the civil war, what is the probability that such weapons will also get into the hands of has both the and other elements supporting the assad regime and thus proliferate the region against friend and foe . I cannot give you that probability. I just do not know what it is. I do know there are three principal supporters of assad and the rest of the world is in horror. Iran, hezbollah, and russia. If iran and has below are allowed to both see him stay in power as well as do so with the use of typ ....
According to the newspaper, at the moment the president and the houston attracts her looking at members of congress opposing. It means he would not get a majority. Many members do not want to see us enter into another civil war. Many members want to see the actual evidence so they can say they can support whatever the president might want to do. A lot of folks are very including the american public. They should be. Until we can prove what the evidence is and what the response would be, i understand the skepticism. It is healthy. We do not want to go into war for the wrong reasons. We do not want to see another iraq. It is appropriate for everyone to say show me. Did the release of the video change views as to what you saw . I have taken a pretty clear position that we must do something. We must act when you had the use of chemical weapons. The evidence is strong. We say it is not something we would allow to occur. I think pretty strongly in that regard. I am interested in finding out i ....