Thank you. Good evening, tim coalen on the San Francisco association. Your decision is one that is noted. This took the city in the exactly the opposite direction of where it should be going in having modest goals as to what our future is. Taking the floor of, it did take off two permanently Affordable Housing units in a city that needs more. They introduced the housing accountability act and found language for it that says that legislature finds and declares all the fouling. Fomg. Following. The lack of housing that threatens california. California has become the most expensive in the nation. The excessive cost of the housing supplies is caused by the activity and policies of many local government that limit the housing and require that high fees be paid by producers of housing. Amongst the consequence are discrimination among those in households and imbalances in jobs and reduced mobility, urban small and excessive community and air quality deterioration. We dont under. We would say
And the design. I will have steve come up. Mr. Pacheco, is there closed captioning possible. Wait a second. I dont know if they are getting it on or not. Steve, the architect for the project. I might want to limit my comments to two architectural issues and how they relate to this condition to limit their envelope and therefore reduce the size of the building. Im not a lawyer but in my reading of all the briefs and the arguments brought forward, its clear to me that there are very many unsettled issues a lot of them do relate to design. There is question of whether the height is a density control or not. The planning code says there is a density control for height and the argument for reducing the control. The question of whether the retail and commercial space on the ground floor does make the building comply with the statute would have to be settled in the courts because the local jurisdiction has a different jurisdiction than the mixed use than the state. Whether it complies to code
A question for you. During the pro curing of the land entitlements we reduced it from 15 units. Then it was reduced to 12 units, thats right. We reduced it in order to comply with the set backs and this type of thing. During the planning entitlement the housing accountability act was not brought up. No, this is the first time before this board. I have a related question. We heard at the last hearing that it was not feasible to conduct the small floors. Steve is prepared to answer those questions in detail. You would basically be making an sro and one of the objection is that the properties are too dense and too small. Thats what they are saying the whole time. If the issue is to just make it harder to build and also make it in feasible from an economic point because we would have to go back and start over with the planning process, with the drafting and the design. I will have steve come up. Mr. Pacheco, is there closed captioning possible. Wait a second. I dont know if they are gettin
And this type of thing. During the planning entitlement the housing accountability act was not brought up. No, this is the first time before this board. I have a related question. We heard at the last hearing that it was not feasible to conduct the small floors. Steve is prepared to answer those questions in detail. You would basically be making an sro and one of the objection is that the properties are too dense and too small. Thats what they are saying the whole time. If the issue is to just make it harder to build and also make it in feasible from an economic point because we would have to go back and start over with the planning process, with the drafting and the design. I will have steve come up. Mr. Pacheco, is there closed captioning possible. Wait a second. I dont know if they are getting it on or not. Steve, the architect for the project. I might want to limit my comments to two architectural issues and how they relate to this condition to limit their envelope and therefore re
Also make it in feasible from an economic point because we would have to go back and start over with the planning process, with the drafting and the design. I will have steve come up. Mr. Pacheco, is there closed captioning possible. Wait a second. I dont know if they are getting it on or not. Steve, the architect for the project. I might want to limit my comments to two architectural issues and how they relate to this condition to limit their envelope and therefore reduce the size of the building. Im not a lawyer but in my reading of all the briefs and the arguments brought forward, its clear to me that there are very many unsettled issues a lot of them do relate to design. There is question of whether the height is a density control or not. The planning code says there is a density control for height and the argument for reducing the control. The question of whether the retail and commercial space on the ground floor does make the building comply with the statute would have to be set