Stay updated with breaking news from Comey fbi. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Reputation has taken a big hit over the last year. do you share any of the responsibility for that? speak at all. the fbi s reputation has taken a big hit because the president of the united states with his acolytes has hired about it constantly. judge jeanine: joining us now with moree on what went on during comey s trip to the hill is catherine herridge. judged her name, after nearly six hour session from a former director james comey talked to reporters and took none of the blame for the damage to fbi s credibility. they ve taken a big hit because the president of the united states with his t acolyts have lied about it constantly. that damage has nothing to do with t me. comey fbi interview a former national director michael flynn, who was not warned that any false statements would be prosecuted. comey declined to answer fox s questionon about whether he mishandled classified information when he shared with ....
Had a case without. how does that not bother everyone listening right now?yb beyond me. judge jeanine: the amazing part of it, monica, you ve got jim comey we just saw the reaction and that sound, where he he is insulted, the president is the liar, the president and his acolytes, when the truth that is jim comey andnd the eight upper echelon of the fbi, they are gone, they are the acolytes, they are the one pushing this false narrative. one is being recommended for criminal prosecution by the doj, that being mccabe. mr. comey is a master of projection, judge. he is so good at recusing president trump and a republicas of exactly what he himself and his cohorts are guilty of. lawbreaking, lying, corruption, being uninterested in the truth. he is deflecting from his own activities by accusing the president and his associates of doing the same ....
The only upside is you enjoyed it while it was happening. speaking for myself and you. we will be back tomorrow at 8:00 p.m., the show that is the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness, and especially groupthink, which is a direct threat to you and your family and your right to make your own decisions. we will be back in support of the free speech. good night from washington, hannity is next and sitting in for him tonight, we are proud to report, is judge jeanine pirro. judge jeanine: this is the upside, too, tucker. [laughter] and welcome to hannity. breaking just moments ago, robert mueller has publicly released preflynn interview document, the official note from peter strzok and an unnamed age of surrounding their january 2017 interrogation u of lieutenant general flynn. we will break this down, this7 development, coming up. but first, disgraced former fbi director james comey was back on capitol hill. ....
Investigated. judge jeanine: dan, after two years, there s been absolutely no evidence connecting this administration, this president, or anyone with any rational collusion, i call it delusion. think about where we are right now. everything w monica just said is absolutely accurate. despite amounts of resources, international intelligence operations trying to verify it, the press, this dossier appears to be one big hoax. here s the problem: the investigation intoo donald trum, judge, would not exist without the dossier. don t take my word for it. i get it, the anti-trump crowd, they see me an enormous support of the president, don t trust me. take the number two at the fbi, former number two, andy mccabe s word for it, who actually said they would not have had a case without the dossier. think about where we are. they spied on the trump team based on a hoax w document that the number two at the fbi himself said they wouldn t have ....
Campaign. were you open to then somebody from any place, friend or foe, providing information for money? that was on the able, you were open to it? i don t understand any other way to interpret this. this gentleman presented himself as an individual, not a person from the government of russia. and then if you read the washington post article, he was offering private information from a former employee of the clinton foundation. this isn t an approach from a government at all. except it s an approach from the united states government by an fbi informant who was working for the fbi for 17 years. what is your evidence of that? i guess i m torn, because it doesn t in a sense matter if the person is an informant or not. what would matter was your intent and belief when you talk that phone call. at the time you didn t think well, i think it does matter. okay, why do you think it matters? it matters because right now we re going with the fallacy, this whole investigation starte ....