Page 3 - Colin Lawrie News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Stay updated with breaking news from Colin lawrie. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Top News In Colin Lawrie Today - Breaking & Trending Today

Judgment Vacated under Rule 60(b)(3) Based on a Witness's False Testimony | Haug Partners LLP


To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
The Federal Circuit recently affirmed a district court ruling setting aside a final judgment of patent infringement, including a $1.1 million damages award and a permanent injunction. The appellee brought the motion to vacate the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(3), which states:
(b) Grounds for Relief from a Final Judgment, Order, or Proceeding. On motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons:
. . .
1
A motion under Rule 60(b)(3) “must be made within a reasonable time,” “no more than a year after the entry of judgment.” ....

Colin Lawrie , Cap Exp , Zinus Inc , Federal Circuit , Federal Rule , Civil Procedure , Final Judgment , Cap Export , Ninth Circuit , கொலின் லாரி , கூட்டாட்சியின் சுற்று , கூட்டாட்சியின் ஆட்சி , சிவில் ப்ரொஸீஜர் , இறுதி தீர்ப்பு , ஒன்பதாவது சுற்று ,

Federal Circuit Puts Patent Infringement Award/Injunction Back in the Box | McDermott Will & Emery


To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, exploring the use of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(3) under Ninth Circuit law, affirmed a district court’s ruling setting aside a monetary damages judgment and an injunction for fraudulent misrepresentations by a corporate patent owner’s president concerning prior art.
Cap Export, LLC, et al. v. Zinus, Inc., et al., Case No. 20-2087 (Fed. Cir. May 5, 2021) (Dyk, J.)
In 2016, Cap Export sued Zinus seeking a declaratory judgment that claims of a patent owned by Zinus were invalid and not infringed. Zinus countersued, alleging that Cap Export infringed its patent covering a bed frame that can be packed into the headboard for compact shipping (known as a “bed in a box”). Zinus filed a motion for partial summary judgment of no invalidity of certain claims, and the court allowed Cap Export to depose Zinus’s then-president and “testifying technica ....

Colin Lawrie , Cap Export , Us Court , Zinus Inc , Mcdermott Will , Federal Circuit , Federal Rule , Civil Procedure , Ninth Circuit , கொலின் லாரி , எங்களுக்கு நீதிமன்றம் , மக்டர்மட் விருப்பம் , கூட்டாட்சியின் சுற்று , கூட்டாட்சியின் ஆட்சி , சிவில் ப்ரொஸீஜர் , ஒன்பதாவது சுற்று ,