when it comes to the trump and the biden documents. watch. the documents about president trump and his classified documents and mar-a-largo, yet when it comes to president biden and all of his classified documents, ranging back from when he was vice president and a senator, they have produced zero documents and have zero websites dedicated to that issue. so there s a clear difference. so that is what we are hearing so far from this closed door hearing. oversight chairman james comer has a lot of questions that he has likely already asked in the first round of questioning. for example, why nara did not tell the public about the documents that they found at president biden s personal office before the mid-term election. that s a big one. and this, of course, as fox news contributor can now confirm that fbi agents started searching the penn biden center sometime in
reasonable, what they re asking for here, would not interfere with these ongoing criminal investigations. and i hope the administration will come up with a better answer than no. but again, the house oversight committee hearing, closed door hearing with the national archives underway, neil. we should hopefully hear from chairman comer soon. thanks, aishah. aishah hasnie. let s go to chris swecker. good to see you. i m wondering who gets first dibs over the committees that want to pour over the documents. the senate intelligence committee. two in the house, oversight and judiciary that essentially want the same thing. how do they settle this, how do you think they settle this? yeah, i don t know the protocols there. but i do know that, you know, from an investigative perspective, from someone that spent 25 years almost in the fbi
incident cassie hutchinson described having been told about by then secret service agent, tony renato, the story trump lunged for steering wheel and lunged at robert ingle, they will say it didn t occur, the event. i m gnaw sure if they re also claiming they didn t tell cassidy hutchinson that the story occurred. will they testify under oath in open hearing? well, first of all, ms. hutchinson testified under oath. i think she provided credible testimony to the committee. and if there are others who have information about the facts she covered, we would like to hear from them. we look forward to hearing their testimony under oath. and as to whether that will be in a public hearing or in a different part of our investigation, we look forward to receiving as much information from those secret service officers and others who can provide information relevant to the work we re doing.
haven t ornoto and engle already testified but behind closed doors? because congressman raskin told me he didn t know of any corroborating evidence. i m just confused about this. were they not asked about it when they testified? i believe their testimony happened earlier, and therefore, we have additional questions to ask them, so we look forward to them and we re glad the secret service has said they re willing to return and speak to the committee more. will they do so openly, in open hearing? you know, as far as which parts of the testimony will be provided live in the hearings or which will be provided through different means to the public, i think that s yet to be determined. all right, democratic congresswoman elaine luria, thank you so much. turning to the still evolving landscape of abortion, and now even contraception in the united states, laws are changing around the country after the supreme court s decision to overturn roe v. wade. the states you see in orange ha