All the government would pay all the nations bills and everybody would have Coverage Area and a public option on the other hand would create a government type program like medicare like medicaid and more available. Right now you have to meet certain qualifications to into any of the government provided health programs. A public option would makeit much easier for people to get into government , government page. For the democrats debating on these issues, why are they so firmly advocating for these two positions. I guess what im asking, whats wrong with the Current System . Everybody agrees the Current System is not working well. People are paying too much, most people have insurance but substantial number of people still do not. A lot of people who do have insurance literally cant afford to use their insurance because they have multithousand dollar deductibles so everybody agrees that we need to fix whats broken. How you do that, democrats generally agree that everybody should have hea
The nofly list you should have a right to be heard or have redress to challenges to be on that list. Some like security makes sense. Others might not. But the larger component is there is adequate control and accountability. So everything such as the individualized noticed, it is not feasible. There is the Greater Transparency also. Not the individuals are notified that the generalized disclosure about what is going on. I thought the knowledge meant that some of the of principles could not be fully implemented in the context of the National Security Surveillance Program was an acknowledgement you cannot provide the error correction notice in all circumstances. I was talking more about that secondary screening of the nofly list. But the challenge for you is to figure out the underlying values. In this context the underlying value is prevention of governmental abuse that is what animates everybody and with that behavior. The types of accountability and transparency you have to help build
Paid for with health and tax reform. If you picked up that packet but this plan would assume the permanent replacement that we have the text extenders for two years onethird comes with medicare to reward quality of care. And then lets get the payment models and then there is that crazy system within that they all have Wraparound Coverage with a much simpler form of formula of the same deductible because the idea but there also have protection against catastrophic and then for most beneficiaries there is more details in the plan. Unfortunately time is too short. So what we propose we know the pieces of tax reform with the corporate and individual side. But nobody wants to go first. And then that goes with the to your suspenders but this package could never raise any bettys tax rates. But first increasing the support to what people already know. But to miss report the income. That gives time for that comprehensive tax reform. Said making it to the reform tax code. It would mess up the de
Distribution. Thats why we have put in the con ticontingency fund. We getof it is if something and at that point believe we need to support further distribution, thats would do asat we well. So distribute a successful vaccine. Allows for largescale manufacture and then distribution . Right now we have put in funds that will help us get to manufacturing. That is what we are focused on in the barta element. Okay. Thank you. You very much, senator hogan. Hearing,p up todays first of all id like to thank forwitnesses here today their cogent testimony. Lot. Nk weve learned a i think it gives us great insight into the president s why that significant amount of money is needed and why, even though it might not be headline, the urgency continues. Follow the like to model that was established under withdent bush and then president obama when we had an disease situation before. Before i wrap up, i also want to comment about dr. Frieden and dr. Fauci, who spent a lot of time, both dealing with th
Previously mark also served as of the tant director 2011 and 20113 months at analyst known as reduction the super committee. Next we have steve bell who director of ior economic policy. On the that steve worked staff of senator pete and budget 1981 to 1986 and last but not least we have bob, he executive tkroebgter of the Concord Coalition. He served a member of the debt force, also no one as the commission who pro a solution for addressing the fiscal challenges. With that ill pose the first panel and each of the panel will have ten minutes to answer and open it up for questions. What do you is, see as the major opportunities for progress in the upcoming can lawmakers w best take advantage of them. Well start with mark. Here and ou for being thanks to the Concord Coalition nd ben for organizing this event. I have entioned substantial experience failing a grand bargain. The concept was relatively traightforward and it was a concept that was pretty broadly to. Eed would have to agree o c