nonmerit requests we found a handful of documents were filed in the wrong place. we immediately turned over to the archives and the justice department. fully cooperating to get this resolved quickly. think you ll find there s nothing there i have no regrets i m following what the lawyers have told me they want me too do. it s exactly what we are doing. there s no there there picasso made out for merger attorney general of the united states, michael, judge thanks so much for coming in. at the top hear what he think of that answer? there is no they are, therefore the president. was not what theirs was to learn special counsel investigation? what s with all due respect there s a plenty there. because the documents were founs were found in an unauthorized place. they were there for several years. they were taken from the white house and placed in on the other unauthorized place for the first place they were founded not open till february 2018. there were some of them the highest
sandra: america reports with the justice department last hour submitting proposed redactions to the affidavit used as the basis of the search of former president trump s florida home. now it s up to a federal judge to determine how much of that document the public will actually get to see. hello, welcome, everyone. i m sandra smith in new york. happy friday eve. john: as we like to call it around here, that s what thursday is. good to see you, sandra. the federal judge who approved the warrant to search mar-a-lago is set to weigh the pros and cons of releasing portions of the affidavit. the judge acknowledged heavy redactions to make the document in essence meaningless. justice department maintaining it could be dangerous to release any part of the affidavit saying it could compromise the investigations. republicans, along with several news organizations are pressing for more information about what prompted the unprecedented search of a former president s home. sandra
this is a culmination of an anonymously long and contentious debate gives it a sense about the importance of this decision as you look back over 50 years. it is profoundly important. justice mentioned in his opinion, that decision roe v wade is primarily response over the culture war that ensued. it did a normative damage to the cultural view get these scenes. was justice byron white said from the dissent from that decision it was a raw exercise of judicial power. that is quite the beginning of judicial activism. the most extreme expression of judicial activism. yet we find rights and the law that don t exist, are not really supportable by legislation. that to set up a long friending 50 year battle in the united states. what happened to happen there s no that is going to change. what has changed here i think is that with this opinion the majority have established legitimacy of supreme court and the fact it does have to adhere to the text of the constitution. cannot make up
On Tuesday, June 4th, Grassroots America s Liberty Education & Action Meeting will feature Mike Belsick, Texas Hill Country Coordinator for Gun Owners of America, and longtime Fredericksburg Tea Party leader
On Tuesday, June 4th, Grassroots America s Liberty Education & Action Meeting will feature Mike Belsick, Texas Hill Country Coordinator for Gun Owners of America, and longtime Fredericksburg Tea Party leader