Laura Ingraham shines a spotlight on everyday Americans and examines how their lives are affected by politics at the federal, state and local level. This is a confusion and an unelected judge trying to supersede and impose his values over the president. Thats what the census is for, to count the people in the country. Laura theyre counting all people. Count the immigrants. Laura hold on, scott. Theyre counting all people. Theres a question about whether youre a citizen or not. Now, what is the problem with answering the question . I dont understand that. What is the possible constitutional argument here . Well, because its racially offensive, first of all. Laura what does it have to do with race . Its directed at brown people and black people. Laura youre making that up. Of course it is. Laura its directed at all people in the country. You ask a question. I get asked the question. You get asked the question. We got another case. Does that mean ill right . Laura out of portland involvin
Laura Ingraham shines a spotlight on everyday Americans and examines how their lives are affected by politics at the federal, state and local level. Census. Up until 1950, we did have it on the census. The census changes and we didnt ask that question. Tell us about the posture of this case and this police judge, jesse furman. Laura what is happening here is that these judges are, you know, taking these cases and imposing their own judicial philosophy and new standards that are not written into the law into these cases. You saw the exact same reasoning that judge furman used here, which is that wilbur ross, in charge of the census in his department, had made some remarks about the reasoning behind wanting to count citizens that raised an issue of animus. Well the United States Supreme Court recently ruled that this Animus Theory is bogus and one of the elements that shouldnt be applied. Clarence thomas has spoken out on nationwide injunctions. So basically, this is a
confusion and we h
actual issue of cohen s credibility. laura: who cares if he knew. the point being the entire case of the russia collusion hinges on him going to prague to secretly conspire with the russians. he said he didn t go. if he s a truth teller around denies this central claim that underpins the russia collusion theory, how come it didn t matter? now it matters because something he said might somehow be molly is right on that. laura: do either of you find it curious that no one in the sort of more mainstream press does any like serious reporting on this? serious reporting on mueller, on what is taking so long and why this attorney client privilege material is dropping out, lanny davis past associations, the countries and the foreign entities that he s represented over the years? they re going after manafort for ukraine. but what is lanny davis clients list looks like?