Clausec 2 News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Clausec 2. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Clausec 2 Today - Breaking & Trending Today
We dont know how they were using this money is not factually true. You heard mcclk chin tok saying he had the mcclintock saying that he had the prosecutor fired. Yet those talking points are respited despite the fact theyre not based on fact. Its an important moment. I want to get your sense of the history of what were about to see. You see the members showing up, the staff, theyre showing up. The witnesses will be there. Theyll be sworn in as well. Its a moment that doesnt happen very often if american history. It doesnt and it shouldnt. Because its so important you think about the the way constitution set up our democratic structure here and were looking back right now to say what did the founded fathers envision about the country that we are now in . What did the separation of powers mean . Are there truly three coequal
branches of government or can one thumb their nose that leads to an authoritarian regime . We are looking at a very historic moment. Looking at what the power of con ....
Whether you think thats good or bad and matches the abuse of powers is an open question. And then he goes through and argues he doesnt see what he calls a statutory crime. And well see that debate as well. There are people youre going to hear from who are going to say its got to be an actual felony and then there are going to be other people pointing out the constitution doesnt require that. It has words like treason, bribery and high crimes. So were going to get into the weeds here, but the big picture is keep your eye on which witnesses and exchanges are talking about the serious question of whats impeachable. The other noise you can try and tune out as with any hearing. Mr. Wiesman, your last words of advice as we settle in to watch the legal experts. I think its very important to keep your eye on the facts and the law. And i think one of the things that the public is rightly upset about is the rule of law not being applied. And so i think the quote you read is fun, its sort of catc ....
Chairman. you can ignore it and not answer it. you can t say it s not aim asking for the rule of we will apply the rules, period. you won t help us understand that? there is no clarity there. how are you siding that? clause c 2 of the judiciary impeachment of procedures. i would how is that unclear? it s the rules of house and they will be applied. period. i m asking how will they applied here, sir? they will be applied according to rules. but not answering your question. a circular response. thank you. platform, can you please it ra it the schedule going forward, in other words are you planning to hold additional hearings? gentleman will suspend. that is not a proper parliamentary inquiry, without objection, all other parliamentary statements will be included in the record. i introduce noah feldman. mr. mr. chairman i seek ....
everyone voted. has everyone voted who wishes to vote? miss bass. misbass votes aye. the clerk will report. mr. chairman, there are 24 aye, 17 nos. the motion to table is agreed to. mr. chairman, i have a parliamentary inquiry. the gentleman will state his parliamentary inquiry. thank you, mr. chairman. clause c 2 of the judiciary impeachment inquiry procedures states that members of the committee can raise objections relating to the admissibility of testimony and evidence, but it doesn t say what rules apply to admissibility. so i m hoping you can explain to us what objections may be made under this clause and if you intend to use the federal rules of evidence the gentleman will suspend, that is not a proper parliamentary inquiry. it is. it is not. i stated the rule. you stated a rule, mr. ....
you stated a rule. you cannic nor it and not answer it but you can t say it s not proper. i m asking for the application of the rule and an explanation. we will apply the rules, period. you won t help us understand that? there s no clarity there. which rule are you citing? how are you citing? clause c 2 of the judiciary committee s impeachment inquiry procedures. how is that unclear? it s the rules of the house and they will be applied, period. i m asking how will they be applied here, sir? they will be applied according to the rules. but not answer your question? mr. chairman, can you please also reiterate the schedule going forward? do you plan to hold additional hearings. the gentleman will suspend, that is not proper. without objection, all other opening statements will be included in the record. i will introduce today s witnesses. ....