Anyone. I resist on that, totally. We dont go out to dinner very much with people. That part of our life seems to have dwindled. Much more when we came here over the years, whatever the time pressure was, whatever the reason, there is less of that hat goes on. I have too much respect for too many. And oh i will regret it and kick myself and say how could i have mentioned him without mentioning her. Lets go to president s, then. It was the president that you have enjoyed working with and havent enjoyed working with . Ive worked to a degree with ll the president s. I havent had a bad relationship with any president , for starters. I think president obama is very, very thoughtful, very careful. Does how to weigh pros and cons and gets along very well. I thought president clinton was unusual in terms of his ability, not just a think through issues and he has got a heck of a great mind, but he also had the ability has the ability, still very vigorously to connect with people on a personal w
Are only showing up because the deal is already had. It caps on dragging on. Was that john kerry has to go to london the day after. He had to have a meeting with the British Foreign minister. The British Foreign minister was staying at the same hotel. On, people started to think, they have to walk home without a deal. How is that going to be with . Hat for john kerry he put his name on the line to get a nuclear deal and twice he would have to walk home empty handed. We are hearing munich, surrender. Imagine what would happen if he did not get a deal. End, it was quite dramatic and a lot of people thought it would not happen. Journalistiranian run down the stairs towards her laptop. The person must have known something. To talkomats tended much more with their generalist than the american diplomats. The american diplomats hardly said a word. Everyone thought, ok, something is happening. She says, there is a deal. Logistics. Rking out it starts to spread, but there is no confirmation. Th
Both sides will exchange reversible concessions for reversible concessions and you reversible concessions for you irreversible concessions for irreversible concessions. Thank you. That is a great place to stop. Underlying all of this is the bitter history of the u. S. And iran. No one better to talk about that then john, who has experienced it in many different ways. Is this really going to make a difference between the u. S. And iran . As our iranian friends like to say, there are only two possibilities. It either will or it wont. So there we are. It is quite simple. They have been speaking and writing very sensibly about iran for many years. This is a very passionate subject in this town. I tell my students at the Naval Academy one could spend his life going to iran in events in washington, whether it is the wilson center, the foundation for the defense of democracy. View. Ideological point of you would never run out of subjects to talk about. It is an issue that a small number of pe
lots of funding. a look at the attorneys arguing for the supreme court. solicitor general benighted states, solicitor s verrilli was sworn into dust seven taking over for a lameness that kagan. earned his law degree from columbia university. he started his career as a law clerk for supreme court justice william brennan. attorney general katsas for independent business. a princeton university graduate earned his law degree from clarence tomas. first that the u.s. court of appeals and district of columbia and later when justice thomas join the supreme court. he previously served as assistant attorney general for the justice department s double division. richard wolf of usa today look at the supreme court oral arguments on the health care law. tell us a bit about the main players the attorneys will hear from over the next several hours. well, you will hear from the government solicitor general who argues cases for the justice department.verrilli, paul clement, solicitor ge
protection and affordable health care act. this arguments are expected to go under way later this month. the supreme court decided they will not televise them. it went to get your thoughts and whether you think this was a good one or a bad one, regardless, tell us why. here s how you can do so, the numbers are on the screen. you can also send us an e-mail. if you want to reach us on twitter, it is @cspajwj. if you want to reach out, go to facebook.com/cspan. here is the paper right up. this is the washington post. the court made a decision on friday. the supreme court released an official response saying that because of the extraordinary public interest in those cases, the court will provide the audio recordings and transcripts of the oral arguments on expedited basis. you can go to the core s website. it will post audio recordings as soon as the files are available to uploading. the audio recordings should be available later than 2:00 p.m.. the recording of the march 28 af