What should you buy right now? In July, we bought gear for the beach, grilling, and staying cool. We also discovered a truly waterproof Bluetooth speaker, a migraine cap, a summery scented candle, and a TikTok-famous hairbrush that lived up to the hype. Shop our finds at Amazon and more
The writers and editors of PEOPLE Shopping share the best products they tried this month. Our picks for June 2023 include home goods, travel gear, and comfy clothes. A portable lamp, laundry detergent for activewear, and an under-$20 beach bag are among the highlights
The writers and editors of PEOPLE Shopping share the best products they tried this month. Our picks for May 2023 include pet finds, clothes, home goods, and kitchen items. An AirTag hack for a GPS dog collar, a pair of petite-friendly linen pants, and a cold-brew coffee maker are among the highlights
[co-author: Lara McMahon]
In
McMorris v. Carlos Lopez & Associates, LLC, a data breach case, the Second Circuit held that plaintiffs may demonstrate standing based on a theory of “increased risk” of future identity theft or fraud following an unauthorized disclosure of their data. With this holding, the Second Circuit joins the Sixth, Seventh, Ninth, and D.C. Circuits in recognizing that a plaintiff can establish an Article III injury based solely on an increased risk of identity theft or fraud.
1 While the Third, Fourth, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits
2 have declined to find standing on the facts of a case alleging an increased risk of future injury, they have not altogether foreclosed the viability of the increased-risk theory.
Pathways for U.S. companies to transfer personal data out of the European Union have been repeatedly blocked by EU authorities concerned by what they perceive as gaps in data protection.