Risk. Nothing less. It does much more. Under their unsupported theory, every civil officer is at risk of impeachment if any given Group Elected to the house decides what was thought to be Important Service to the country when they served now deserves to be cancelled. They have made clear in public statements that what they want to accomplish is bar donald trump from running from Political Office again. This is an affront to the constitution no matter who they target today. It Means Nothing less than a denial of the right to vote and the independence right for a candidate to run for elected Political Office guaranteed by the first and 14th amendments to the United States constitution. Under the guise of impeachment as a tool to disenfranchise. Perhaps my friends put the situation simply and sharply last week on his radio show. My friend is a lawyer that serves as an ambassador to former president obama and has friends among you. He described himselves a died in the wolf lifelong democra
The head. This wasnt just Senate Chambers. It was the scene of the crime not too long ago. And as those images were being replayed, i sensed a lot of my colleagues reliving the experience of january 6th. As horrific as the images were, ive been seeing over and over again, its equally horrific that the violence did not come as a surprise. If youve been listening to donald trump not just that morning, but for years now. When you saw the video, and well play a bit more of it shortly, what did it feel like in the Senate Chamber to you . What was the level of interest of your colleagues during what was a quite graphic and understandably disturbing at Times Realtime Presentation of what happened on january 6th . I mean, i guess another word that comes to mind is very sobering. The images were compelling. Truth be told, ari, i was not in the senate at that time. I was sworn in a couple of weeks after. To be clear, im just very curious, today, what was it like . Exactly. So ill tell you my oth
Directly at risk. Nothing less. And it does much more. Under their unsupportable constitutional theory and tortured reading of the text, every civil officer who has served is at risk of impeachment if any given Group Elected to the house decides that what was thought to be Important Service to the country when they served now deserves to be canceled. They made clear in public statements that what they really want to accomplish here in the name of the constitution is to bar donald trump from ever running for Political Office again. But this is an affront to the constitution, no matter who they target today. It Means Nothing less than the denial of the right to vote and independent right for a candidate to run for elected Political Office guaranteed by the first and 14th amendments to the United States constitution under the guise of impeachment as a tool to disenfranchise. Perhaps my friend put the situation simply and sharply into focus last week on his radio show. My friend is a disti
Nothing the presidency directly at risk. Nothing less. And it does much more. Under nothing less. And it does much more. Under their nothing less. And it does much more. Under their unsupportable constitutional theory, and tortured reading constitutional theory, and tortured reading Of Constitutional theory, and tortured reading of the text, every civil Officer Reading of the text, every civil officer who has served is at risk of impeachment if any given group eiected impeachment if any given Group Elected to the house decides that what was elected to the house decides that what was thought to be Important Service what was thought to be Important Service to what was thought to be Important Service to the country and they served service to the country and they served now deserves to be cancelled. They have served now deserves to be cancelled. They have made clear in public sickness they have made clear in public sickness that what they really want to accomplish here, in the name of the