Donald trumps criminal trial. The witnesses, the receipts, today, prosecutors began by actually arguing the defendant should be held in contempt again for new fresh Gag Order Violations even after he lost the last Gag Order Clash on tuesday. Prosecution looking at statements that trump put out about witnesses. As well as attacking the jury itself. Prosecutors say trumps violations are corrosive to the fair trial that he deserves and that the system requires. They also accuse them of creating an air of menace that could affect these jurors. Also denouncing persistent and escalating rhetoric. Now the judge found that trump lost his previous defense about this. Ruling that he did violate the gag order, fining him about 9,000. And that was just this week. Trump has clearly broken the rules. I say that again, not as a criticism, but based on what we have observed in the trial. What the judge has ruled. Here he was just last night. I dont think there has ever been a more conflicted judge. Cr
Fresh, gag order violations, even after he lost the last gag order clash tuesday. The prosecution looking at statements that trump put out about witnesses, as well as attacking the jury itself. Prosecutors say the violations are corrosive to the fair trial that he deserves, and that the system requires. They also accuse him of creating an air of menace that could affect these jurors. Also denouncing persistent and escalating rhetoric. Now, the judge found that judge lost his previous defense about this, ruling that he did violate the gag order, fining him about 9,000, and that was just this week. Trump has clearly broken the rules. I say that again, not as a criticism, but based on what we have observed in the trial, what the judge has ruled. Here he was just last night. I dont think theres ever been a more conflicted judge. Crooked and conflicted. Im unconstitutionally gagged, so im not supposed to be talking to you, because he gagged me. Trump there trying to play up the gagging whil
system is designed. our whole system is designed that no one has all the power. and he just doesn t want to accept that. and remember, john, a moment when i was governor and i had an initiative. the legislator wasn t cooperating and i was mad as hell and said why don t they do this in the legislator and all that, and then i suddenly stopped and had an insight, and the insight was i ve got to persuade them. they have the power, and if i can t get them to do what i think is right, that s on me not on them. and i think he s got to come to that realization. he s got to learn to work with congress and the courts and all the other constituencies that are a part of this power sharing system that defines this government. the opposite of that insight would be what axios is just reporting right now that the president of the united states is considering an executive order to try to add the citizenship question back to the census. basic civic question, does he have the power to do that under
i don t have to do it for the electioni isism . i have already done a lost wall for the election in 2020. nancy pelosi blasted the decision as a power grab. they are signalling that democrats will fight it out in courts. president trump responded to any potential legal challenges. we will have a national emergency and we will then be sued and they will sue us in the ninth circuit even though it should not be there. we will possibly getting a bad ruling and another bad ruling and then we will end up in the supreme court and hopefully get a fair shake and win in the supreme court. [laughing]. you were talking about how this civic question. it s how the bill goes to court. yes. he said it in a nice sing-song way. we have to remind everybody when
the auction blocks to the separation of native american families. tucker: i hope you re following that at home, immigration, it turns out, is not a civic question that american voters might be allowed to have opinions about, it s bigger than that. it is a moral outrage, it is a humanitarian crisis. the law is irrelevant here. so are any of your stupid, selfish concerns about the effect of impoverished foreigners moving into your neighborhood or your school district. the rule here is simple, listen carefully. if people from a place poorer than america want to move to america, they get to do that. period. if you disagree or complain or do anything other than recite a poem at the bottom of the statue of liberty, you are you already know what you are, you ve heard it a thousand times, but we will tell you again anyway. maybe this time it will penetrate. you are a racist. they see those pictures and are being told, fear those brown people. democrats are a diverse party, republicans