Fulton versus city of philadelphia. Ms. Windham. Mr. Chief justice and may it please theourt, the court below made a simple error. They failed to understand where emplment division versus sth controls and where it doesnt. Ith doesnt control when the government uses the system of individualized exemptions. Orem when it makes other exceptions that underminets rules or when it changes the rules to phibit a religious practice. Philadelphia made all threefe those errors here and the city still cant identify a neutral genelly applicable law even ter six attempts and in our knowledge is its decisions are subjective and individualized. The courts belowtill apply to smith and even said smith would be a dea letter if petitioners prevailed a that demonstrates the confusion and instability smith has csed. Respondents rather than defendansmith asked the court for a newly minted nstitutional standard that is even less protective of religious exercise and that approa has no basis in the text, history
The l. A. Times david savage on cspans q a. Just after the, president ial race was called for joe biden, President Trumps attorney, rudy giuliani, held a News Conference on allegations of voter fraud, focusing on the state of pennsylvania. Mr. Giuliani thank you for coming. I am here on behalf of the Truck Campaign as an attorney for the president to describe to you the first part of a situation that is extremely troubling. Troublin. First of all, for the state of the commonwealth of pennsylvania, and for a number of other states. And these lawsuits will be brought starting on monday. The first time it was discovered was here in pennsylvania just a couple of days ago. The people you see behind me are just a few of about, id say 50 to 60 poll watchers who will all testify that they were uniformly that they were uniformly deprived of their right to inspect any single part of the mailin ballots. As you know from the very beginning, the mailin ballots where the source of some degree of ske
Coming. I am here on behalf of the truck i am here behalf of the Trump Campaign as an attorney for the president to describe to you the first part of a situation that is extremely troubling. You the first part of a situation that is extremely, extremely troubling. First of all, for the state of the commonwealth of pennsylvania, and for a number of other states. And these lawsuits will be brought starting on monday. The first time it was discovered was here in pennsylvania just a couple of days ago. The people you see behind me are just a few of about, id say 50 to 60 poll watchers who will all testify that they were uniformly that they were uniformly deprived of their right to inspect any single part of the mailin ballots. As you know from the very beginning, the mailin ballots where the source of some degree of skepticism there is not a lot of skepticism as being prone to fraud. The New York Times had written that 10 years ago under other circumstances, but of course changed their min
Fulton versus city of philadelphia. The honorable chief justice and associate justices of the Supreme Court of the United States. Oye, oye, oye. All persons having business honorable, the Supreme Court of the United States are admonished to get their attention for the court is now sitting. God save the United States and this honorable court. Roberts we will hear argument this morning in case number 19120 three, fulton versus city of philadelphia. Ms. Windham . Mr. Chief justice and may it please the court. The courts below made a civil error. They fail to understand where smith controls and where does not. Smith does not control where a government uses individual exemptions or makes other exceptions that undermine rules or when it changes rules to prohibit a religious practice. Philadelphia made all three errors here. The city cannot identify a neutral, generally applicable law after six attempt. Attempts. It now acknowledges its decisions are subjective and individualized. Yet the cou
What a beautiful day. Thank you for coming. Im here on behalf of the Trump Campaign as an attorney for the president , to describe to you the first part of a situation that is extremely, extremely troubling. First of all, for the state of the commonwealth of pennsylvania, and for a number of other states. And these lawsuits will be brought starting on monday. The first time it was discovered was here in pennsylvania just a couple of days ago. The people you see behind me are just a few of about, id say 50 to 60 poll watchers who will all testify that they were uniformly that they were uniformly deprived of their right to inspect any single part of the mailin ballots. As you know from the very beginning, the mailin ballots where the source of some degree of skepticism there is not a lot of skepticism as being prone to fraud. The New York Times had written that 10 years ago under other circumstances, but of course changed their mind once it was a situation involving President Trump. Jord